Biliary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the efficacy and safety of concomitant catheter cholecystostomy during biliary lithotripsy.

The Journal of stone disease Pub Date : 1993-07-01
P O Moon, D E Scheeres
{"title":"Biliary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the efficacy and safety of concomitant catheter cholecystostomy during biliary lithotripsy.","authors":"P O Moon,&nbsp;D E Scheeres","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The major limitations of biliary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) relate to adequate stone fragmentation and clearance of the stone fragments. We hypothesized the removal of small fragments with concomitant catheter cholecystostomy during ESWL would improve its efficacy. ESWL with aspiration or flushing through three different cholecystostomy catheters was performed on pigs with surgically implanted gallstones. Twenty-two percent and 46% of the pre-ESWL stone weight were aspirated through the 10 and 12 French catheters respectively. The clearance, size, and visualization of fragments was not significantly different between any of the groups. No significant post-mortem tissue or catheter damage was found. Catheter aspiration is a safe and effective method of removing gallstone fragments during biliary ESWL, but it does not improve stone fragmentation, stone clearance, or visualization of other fragments.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 3","pages":"184-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The major limitations of biliary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) relate to adequate stone fragmentation and clearance of the stone fragments. We hypothesized the removal of small fragments with concomitant catheter cholecystostomy during ESWL would improve its efficacy. ESWL with aspiration or flushing through three different cholecystostomy catheters was performed on pigs with surgically implanted gallstones. Twenty-two percent and 46% of the pre-ESWL stone weight were aspirated through the 10 and 12 French catheters respectively. The clearance, size, and visualization of fragments was not significantly different between any of the groups. No significant post-mortem tissue or catheter damage was found. Catheter aspiration is a safe and effective method of removing gallstone fragments during biliary ESWL, but it does not improve stone fragmentation, stone clearance, or visualization of other fragments.

胆道体外冲击波碎石术:胆道碎石术中胆囊造瘘术的有效性和安全性。
胆道体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的主要局限性在于能否充分粉碎和清除结石碎片。我们假设在ESWL中切除小碎片并同时进行导管胆囊造瘘可以提高其疗效。通过三种不同的胆囊造瘘导管对手术植入胆结石的猪进行ESWL抽吸或冲洗。eswl前结石重量的22%和46%分别通过10根和12根法式导管吸入。碎片的清除率、大小和可视化在任何组之间都没有显著差异。没有发现明显的死后组织或导管损伤。导管抽吸是胆道ESWL中一种安全有效的去除胆结石碎片的方法,但它不能改善结石碎片、结石清除或其他碎片的可见性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信