{"title":"Edge targeting reduces the number of shock waves required for biliary ESWL in vitro.","authors":"J Affronti, T Flournoy, J Baillie, F Cocks","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In vitro experiments were conducted to determine if differences in targeting would effect stone fragmentation. Ten pairs of twin gallstones were used. The stones in each pair were identical in volume, diameter, radiolucency, and gross shape. One stone from each pair was subjected to shock waves focused at the center of the stone; the other was treated with shock waves targeted at the edge. Lithotripsy was terminated when all fragments were less than 5mm in diameter. The total number of shock waves used for each stone was recorded. In 7 of 10 pairs, fewer shock waves were required to fragment the edge targeted stone than the center targeted stone. In two of the remaining three pairs, equal numbers of shock waves were required for complete fragmentation. The difference between edge targeting and center targeting was shown to be statistically significant using the nonparametric Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test. (1 tailed = p less than 0.02, 2 tailed = p less than 0.04). These findings suggest that the outcome of biliary lithotripsy may be improved by targeting the edge of the stone.</p>","PeriodicalId":80218,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of stone disease","volume":"5 3","pages":"179-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of stone disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In vitro experiments were conducted to determine if differences in targeting would effect stone fragmentation. Ten pairs of twin gallstones were used. The stones in each pair were identical in volume, diameter, radiolucency, and gross shape. One stone from each pair was subjected to shock waves focused at the center of the stone; the other was treated with shock waves targeted at the edge. Lithotripsy was terminated when all fragments were less than 5mm in diameter. The total number of shock waves used for each stone was recorded. In 7 of 10 pairs, fewer shock waves were required to fragment the edge targeted stone than the center targeted stone. In two of the remaining three pairs, equal numbers of shock waves were required for complete fragmentation. The difference between edge targeting and center targeting was shown to be statistically significant using the nonparametric Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test. (1 tailed = p less than 0.02, 2 tailed = p less than 0.04). These findings suggest that the outcome of biliary lithotripsy may be improved by targeting the edge of the stone.
进行了体外实验,以确定靶向性的差异是否会影响结石碎裂。使用了10对双胆结石。每对钻石在体积、直径、透光率和大体形状上都是相同的。每对石头中的一颗受到集中在石头中心的冲击波的影响;另一组则用冲击波对准边缘。当所有碎片直径小于5mm时终止碎石。记录每颗石头所使用的冲击波总数。在10对中的7对中,粉碎边缘目标结石所需的冲击波比粉碎中心目标结石所需的冲击波要少。在剩下的三对中,有两对需要相同数量的冲击波才能完全破碎。使用非参数Wilcoxin符号秩检验,边缘靶向和中心靶向之间的差异具有统计学意义。(1尾= p < 0.02, 2尾= p < 0.04)。这些发现表明,针对结石边缘进行胆道碎石可能会改善结果。