Are the Twin Cities a Stage V marketplace?

Integrated healthcare report Pub Date : 1995-06-01
{"title":"Are the Twin Cities a Stage V marketplace?","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Twin Cities continues to be an outstanding laboratory for discovering what could be the future in many other markets. Over the last year or two it has been the site of massive consolidation among hospitals, physicians and health plans. Even as the entire infrastructure for healthcare financing and delivery has changed, the state has turned in a good performance in comparison with national cost averages. It is hard to beat premium levels that are 25%-35% lower than national benchmarks. And, these have been achieved by the marketplace, not by government. Nevertheless, employers aren't completely satisfied and the sources of discontent are very instructive. The natural course of market change throughout the country is consolidation from many fragmented competing groups down to a handful of large integrated systems. From an employer/consumer perspective, this natural evolution will reduce competition, concentrate power, eliminate choice, weaken the employer's negotiating leverage, discourage innovation, and reduce the responsiveness and sensitivity to customer service needs. Strategies have to be devised by those engaged in integrated health systems development to counter the perception that consolidation is only an attempt to grab market share. True integration should produce demonstrable improvements in the quality, coordination and delivery of care. But, the trick is understanding the employer and consumer perspective on \"improvements\". The financing and delivery of healthcare has literally been hidden inside a \"black box\" for as far back as anyone can remember.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":79647,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare report","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Twin Cities continues to be an outstanding laboratory for discovering what could be the future in many other markets. Over the last year or two it has been the site of massive consolidation among hospitals, physicians and health plans. Even as the entire infrastructure for healthcare financing and delivery has changed, the state has turned in a good performance in comparison with national cost averages. It is hard to beat premium levels that are 25%-35% lower than national benchmarks. And, these have been achieved by the marketplace, not by government. Nevertheless, employers aren't completely satisfied and the sources of discontent are very instructive. The natural course of market change throughout the country is consolidation from many fragmented competing groups down to a handful of large integrated systems. From an employer/consumer perspective, this natural evolution will reduce competition, concentrate power, eliminate choice, weaken the employer's negotiating leverage, discourage innovation, and reduce the responsiveness and sensitivity to customer service needs. Strategies have to be devised by those engaged in integrated health systems development to counter the perception that consolidation is only an attempt to grab market share. True integration should produce demonstrable improvements in the quality, coordination and delivery of care. But, the trick is understanding the employer and consumer perspective on "improvements". The financing and delivery of healthcare has literally been hidden inside a "black box" for as far back as anyone can remember.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

双子城是第五阶段的市场吗?
双子城仍然是一个杰出的实验室,可以发现许多其他市场的未来。在过去的一两年里,医院、医生和健康计划在这里进行了大规模的整合。尽管整个医疗融资和提供的基础设施都发生了变化,但与全国平均成本相比,该州的表现还是不错的。中国股市的溢价水平比国家基准水平低25%-35%,很难超越这一水平。这些都是由市场实现的,而不是政府。然而,雇主并不完全满意,不满的来源是非常有启发意义的。全国市场变化的自然过程是从许多分散的竞争集团整合到少数几个大型综合系统。从雇主/消费者的角度来看,这种自然演变将减少竞争,集中权力,消除选择,削弱雇主的谈判杠杆,阻碍创新,降低对客户服务需求的响应和敏感性。从事综合卫生系统发展的人必须制定战略,以反驳那种认为整合只是为了夺取市场份额的看法。真正的一体化应在保健的质量、协调和提供方面产生明显的改善。但是,诀窍在于理解雇主和消费者对“改进”的看法。从人们记事起,医疗保健的融资和提供就一直隐藏在一个“黑盒子”里。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信