Variations in clinical experience of pre-registration house officers: the effect of London.

Abstract

A postal questionnaire was used to examine possible differences in clinical experience of pre-registration house officers (PHROs) in eight former English regions, and, within the Thames regions, between teaching hospitals, and non-teaching hospitals in Inner London, Outer London and outside London. The main measurements were the numbers of patients clerked in an average week as emergency, routine or day admissions or as outpatients; the number of patients under the respondents' care at time of reply; the experience of specific clinical conditions gained; the overall adequacy of clinical experience; and the suitability of posts for preparing respondents to work as casualty officers, senior house officers, or general practitioners. The results indicate that less clinical experience was acquired by PRHOs training in the Thames regions. They had fewer admissions per week, fewer patients, and exposure to fewer surgical conditions. Within the Thames regions, there was a gradient of improving educational quality (in all areas of this study) from the teaching hospitals, through the non-teaching hospitals in inner and in outer London, and then to the hospitals outside London. No differences were found between Thames region posts outside London and non-Thames regions.