Innovative automation: the competitive/collaborative human factor.

Administrative radiology : AR Pub Date : 1995-03-01
U Vaisman, F Kamrath, K Foth
{"title":"Innovative automation: the competitive/collaborative human factor.","authors":"U Vaisman,&nbsp;F Kamrath,&nbsp;K Foth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In summary, a dual-group in-hospital Radiology practice by two competing groups is not only feasible, it is indeed a very viable and practical option, capable of producing numerous benefits to patients, practitioners, staffers and facilities. For the model to succeed, there has to be full cooperation on the part of the hospital administrative staff coupled with their firm mandate to facilitate such a progressive practice. Once the process is clearly and carefully explained to the support staff, with well-defined instructions and ground rules, implementation of the model becomes a matter of following a carefully detailed plan of operation. Our experience with this unique alignment produced challenges for all involved. Our Radiologists were tasked to evolve their practice techniques. As well, all our staff and administration were called to redesign, adapt and utilized at St. Elizabeth's Hospital. In our own way, we see our process of assessment, adaptation and implementation of the dual-group model as a schematic for the wellness of Radiology and perhaps even all of Medicine. Our unified focus to achieve a common goal for the good of all, most particularly our patients, has led us through the fog of fear and trepidation into the clarity of reward. Vision becomes reality through individual effort; and all who come through the doors of St. Elizabeth's, now reap its numerable rewards. And most particularly for our healthcare recipients, the one year experience of two competing groups of radiologists working side by side within the Radiology Department of a single hospital, without an exclusive contract, indicates that the model is successful and has no negative impact on patientcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":79550,"journal":{"name":"Administrative radiology : AR","volume":"14 3","pages":"23-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative radiology : AR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In summary, a dual-group in-hospital Radiology practice by two competing groups is not only feasible, it is indeed a very viable and practical option, capable of producing numerous benefits to patients, practitioners, staffers and facilities. For the model to succeed, there has to be full cooperation on the part of the hospital administrative staff coupled with their firm mandate to facilitate such a progressive practice. Once the process is clearly and carefully explained to the support staff, with well-defined instructions and ground rules, implementation of the model becomes a matter of following a carefully detailed plan of operation. Our experience with this unique alignment produced challenges for all involved. Our Radiologists were tasked to evolve their practice techniques. As well, all our staff and administration were called to redesign, adapt and utilized at St. Elizabeth's Hospital. In our own way, we see our process of assessment, adaptation and implementation of the dual-group model as a schematic for the wellness of Radiology and perhaps even all of Medicine. Our unified focus to achieve a common goal for the good of all, most particularly our patients, has led us through the fog of fear and trepidation into the clarity of reward. Vision becomes reality through individual effort; and all who come through the doors of St. Elizabeth's, now reap its numerable rewards. And most particularly for our healthcare recipients, the one year experience of two competing groups of radiologists working side by side within the Radiology Department of a single hospital, without an exclusive contract, indicates that the model is successful and has no negative impact on patientcare.

创新自动化:竞争/协作的人的因素。
综上所述,两个相互竞争的团体在医院内进行双组放射学实践不仅是可行的,而且确实是一个非常可行和实用的选择,能够为患者、医生、工作人员和设施带来许多好处。要使这种模式取得成功,医院行政工作人员必须充分合作,并给予他们促进这种进步做法的坚定授权。一旦向支持人员清楚而仔细地解释了流程,并明确定义了说明和基本规则,模型的实现就变成了遵循仔细详细的操作计划的问题。我们在这种独特结盟方面的经验给所有相关人员带来了挑战。我们的放射科医生的任务是发展他们的实践技术。同时,我们所有的工作人员和管理人员都被要求重新设计、适应和利用圣伊丽莎白医院。以我们自己的方式,我们将评估、适应和实施双组模型的过程视为放射学乃至整个医学健康的示意图。为了所有人的利益,尤其是我们的病人的利益,我们一致致力于实现一个共同的目标,这使我们走出了恐惧和恐慌的迷雾,进入了回报的明晰。愿景通过个人的努力变成现实;所有走进圣伊丽莎白教堂大门的人,现在都收获了无数的回报。尤其对我们的医疗保健接受者来说,两组相互竞争的放射科医生在同一家医院的放射科并肩工作一年的经验,没有独家合同,表明这种模式是成功的,对病人的护理没有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信