Clinical skills problems. A valid instrument for assessing competence?

J W Gilliam, C J Staropoli
{"title":"Clinical skills problems. A valid instrument for assessing competence?","authors":"J W Gilliam,&nbsp;C J Staropoli","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physician assistants are required to take the clinical skills problems (CSP) portion of the National Certifying Examination administered by the National Commission on Certification of Physician's Assistants (NCCPA). No comparable section exists in entry-level physician certification examinations because studies have shown that this type of examination is neither a valid nor a reliable indicator of clinical competence. A published account of the studies used to implement the CSP portion of the National Certifying Examination contained serious flaws, calling the research into question. Denial of certification based solely on failure on the CSP portion of the National Certifying Examination could be challenged legally. The CSP is invalid and unreliable, and should be eliminated.</p>","PeriodicalId":79709,"journal":{"name":"Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physician assistant (American Academy of Physician Assistants)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physician assistants are required to take the clinical skills problems (CSP) portion of the National Certifying Examination administered by the National Commission on Certification of Physician's Assistants (NCCPA). No comparable section exists in entry-level physician certification examinations because studies have shown that this type of examination is neither a valid nor a reliable indicator of clinical competence. A published account of the studies used to implement the CSP portion of the National Certifying Examination contained serious flaws, calling the research into question. Denial of certification based solely on failure on the CSP portion of the National Certifying Examination could be challenged legally. The CSP is invalid and unreliable, and should be eliminated.

临床技能问题。评估能力的有效工具?
医师助理需要参加由国家医师助理认证委员会(NCCPA)管理的国家认证考试的临床技能问题(CSP)部分。在初级医师资格考试中没有类似的章节,因为研究表明这种类型的考试既不是有效的,也不是临床能力的可靠指标。一份公布的研究报告显示,用于实施国家认证考试CSP部分的研究存在严重缺陷,这使得这项研究受到质疑。仅仅因为没有通过国家认证考试的CSP部分而拒绝认证可能会受到法律挑战。CSP是无效的,不可靠的,应该被淘汰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信