Concurrent ceftazidime DUE with clinical pharmacy intervention.

Hospital formulary Pub Date : 1994-05-01
A U Okpara, O M Van Duyn, T R Cate, L K Cheung, M A Galley
{"title":"Concurrent ceftazidime DUE with clinical pharmacy intervention.","authors":"A U Okpara,&nbsp;O M Van Duyn,&nbsp;T R Cate,&nbsp;L K Cheung,&nbsp;M A Galley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ceftazidime use at our institution, a 580-bed county teaching hospital, has steadily increased since its addition to the formulary in 1986. In response to this increased use and because the institutional antibiogram showed increased resistance by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (from 10 to 28% resistant), the P & T Committee requested that a drug use evaluation (DUE) of ceftazidime be conducted. Analysis of this retrospective pilot study showed that 87% of ceftazidime use was inappropriate. To further evaluate ceftazidime use, to identify problems not assessed during retrospective review, and to correct problems while patients were receiving the drug, a concurrent ceftazidime use evaluation was conducted. The methods and results of the concurrent review are presented below.</p>","PeriodicalId":76912,"journal":{"name":"Hospital formulary","volume":"29 5","pages":"392-4, 399, 402-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital formulary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ceftazidime use at our institution, a 580-bed county teaching hospital, has steadily increased since its addition to the formulary in 1986. In response to this increased use and because the institutional antibiogram showed increased resistance by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (from 10 to 28% resistant), the P & T Committee requested that a drug use evaluation (DUE) of ceftazidime be conducted. Analysis of this retrospective pilot study showed that 87% of ceftazidime use was inappropriate. To further evaluate ceftazidime use, to identify problems not assessed during retrospective review, and to correct problems while patients were receiving the drug, a concurrent ceftazidime use evaluation was conducted. The methods and results of the concurrent review are presented below.

头孢他啶与临床药学干预同时进行。
在我们这个拥有580张床位的县教学医院,头孢他啶的使用量自1986年加入处方以来稳步增加。为了应对这种增加的使用,并且由于机构抗生素谱显示铜绿假单胞菌的耐药性增加(从10%到28%的耐药性),药检局委员会要求对头孢他啶进行药物使用评估(DUE)。这项回顾性初步研究的分析显示87%的头孢他啶使用是不适当的。为了进一步评估头孢他啶的使用情况,发现回顾性评价中未评估的问题,并在患者服药时纠正问题,我们同时进行了头孢他啶的使用评估。并行审查的方法和结果如下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信