Patient satisfaction with a psychiatric day treatment program.

V Russell, K Busby
{"title":"Patient satisfaction with a psychiatric day treatment program.","authors":"V Russell,&nbsp;K Busby","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient perceptions can contribute significantly to partial hospitalization program evaluation. A retrospective study of patients' satisfaction ratings and comments concerning a day treatment program using a discharge questionnaire yielded high degrees of satisfaction. This may reflect a priori selection biases toward patients who formed a working alliance within the program. Comparison with a group of patients admitted to the program who did not complete a discharge questionnaire failed to differentiate the two groups on the basis of demographic or clinical characteristics. Attendance by males admitted to the program who completed a questionnaire was significantly (p less than .01) more frequent than by males who did not complete the questionnaire. Consistency in individual component ratings with overall satisfaction with the program suggests nonspecific benefits, with group psychotherapy evoking polarized perceptions. The latter observation suggests the need for careful matching of patients with specific treatment modalities employed in a day treatment setting. Suggestions are made regarding the administration and construction of a patient satisfaction questionnaire as well as for the application of this measure in enhancing program efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79650,"journal":{"name":"International journal of partial hospitalization","volume":"7 2","pages":"109-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of partial hospitalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient perceptions can contribute significantly to partial hospitalization program evaluation. A retrospective study of patients' satisfaction ratings and comments concerning a day treatment program using a discharge questionnaire yielded high degrees of satisfaction. This may reflect a priori selection biases toward patients who formed a working alliance within the program. Comparison with a group of patients admitted to the program who did not complete a discharge questionnaire failed to differentiate the two groups on the basis of demographic or clinical characteristics. Attendance by males admitted to the program who completed a questionnaire was significantly (p less than .01) more frequent than by males who did not complete the questionnaire. Consistency in individual component ratings with overall satisfaction with the program suggests nonspecific benefits, with group psychotherapy evoking polarized perceptions. The latter observation suggests the need for careful matching of patients with specific treatment modalities employed in a day treatment setting. Suggestions are made regarding the administration and construction of a patient satisfaction questionnaire as well as for the application of this measure in enhancing program efficacy.

病人对精神科日间治疗计划的满意度。
病人的认知对部分住院计划的评估有重要的贡献。使用出院问卷对患者满意度评分和对日间治疗方案的评论进行回顾性研究,得出了很高的满意度。这可能反映了对在项目内形成工作联盟的患者的先验选择偏见。与未完成出院问卷的一组入院患者进行比较,无法根据人口统计学或临床特征区分两组。参与该项目的男性中,完成问卷调查的男性出勤率显著高于未完成问卷调查的男性(p < 0.01)。个体成分评分与项目总体满意度的一致性表明非特定的益处,团体心理治疗引起两极分化的看法。后一项观察表明,需要仔细匹配患者与特定的治疗方式,在一天的治疗设置。对患者满意度调查问卷的编制和管理提出了建议,并对该措施在提高项目效果中的应用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信