Less miscarriage in pregnancy following Tamoxifen treatment of infertile patients with luteal phase dysfunction as compared to clomiphene treatment.

C H Wu
{"title":"Less miscarriage in pregnancy following Tamoxifen treatment of infertile patients with luteal phase dysfunction as compared to clomiphene treatment.","authors":"C H Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and the reproductive outcomes of Tamoxifen (TMX) vs. clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment in infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-seven consecutive infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction were randomly assigned to two treatment groups as: group 1 (TMX followed by CC) and group 2 (CC followed by TMX). The medications administered in the initial and the subsequent cross-over phase were given for 4 to 6 cycles except in those patients who achieved pregnancy within the first three cycles of treatment. The rates of pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and live-birth were calculated for comparison. Demographic profile and the frequency of other infertility factors between the two groups were comparable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pregnancy rates were similar between TMX and CC treatment (initial treatment phase: TMX, 50.0% vs. CC, 56.4%; subsequent treatment phase: CC, 33.3% vs. TMX, 47.1%), but the abortion rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in TMX treatments (initial treatment phase: 8.3% and subsequent treatment phase: 12.5%) than that of CC treatments (initial treatment phase: 22.7% and subsequent treatment phase: 62.5%). When the rates were calculated by pooling the patients according to the medication they received, the miscarriage rate was significantly lower (p < 0.05) if the patients conceived during the TMX treatment (9.4% vs. CC, 33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tamoxifen and clomiphene citrate seem to be similarly effective in achieving pregnancy in patients with luteal phase dysfunction. However, Tamoxifen therapy is associated with a lower incidence of spontaneous abortion; thus Tamoxifen may be the better choice for the therapy of infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11444,"journal":{"name":"Early pregnancy : biology and medicine : the official journal of the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early pregnancy : biology and medicine : the official journal of the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and the reproductive outcomes of Tamoxifen (TMX) vs. clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment in infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.

Methods: Eighty-seven consecutive infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction were randomly assigned to two treatment groups as: group 1 (TMX followed by CC) and group 2 (CC followed by TMX). The medications administered in the initial and the subsequent cross-over phase were given for 4 to 6 cycles except in those patients who achieved pregnancy within the first three cycles of treatment. The rates of pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and live-birth were calculated for comparison. Demographic profile and the frequency of other infertility factors between the two groups were comparable.

Results: The pregnancy rates were similar between TMX and CC treatment (initial treatment phase: TMX, 50.0% vs. CC, 56.4%; subsequent treatment phase: CC, 33.3% vs. TMX, 47.1%), but the abortion rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in TMX treatments (initial treatment phase: 8.3% and subsequent treatment phase: 12.5%) than that of CC treatments (initial treatment phase: 22.7% and subsequent treatment phase: 62.5%). When the rates were calculated by pooling the patients according to the medication they received, the miscarriage rate was significantly lower (p < 0.05) if the patients conceived during the TMX treatment (9.4% vs. CC, 33.3%).

Conclusions: Tamoxifen and clomiphene citrate seem to be similarly effective in achieving pregnancy in patients with luteal phase dysfunction. However, Tamoxifen therapy is associated with a lower incidence of spontaneous abortion; thus Tamoxifen may be the better choice for the therapy of infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.

与克罗米芬治疗相比,他莫昔芬治疗伴有黄体期功能障碍的不孕症患者妊娠流产较少。
目的:比较他莫昔芬(TMX)与枸橼酸克罗米芬(CC)治疗黄体期功能障碍不孕妇女的疗效和生殖结局。方法:87例黄体期功能障碍的连续不孕症患者随机分为两组:1组(TMX + CC)和2组(CC + TMX)。在最初和随后的交叉阶段给予的药物给予4至6个周期,除了在前三个治疗周期内怀孕的患者。计算妊娠率、自然流产率和活产率进行比较。两组之间的人口统计学特征和其他不孕因素的频率具有可比性。结果:TMX与CC治疗的妊娠率相似(初始治疗阶段:TMX, 50.0% vs. CC, 56.4%;后续治疗阶段:CC, 33.3% vs. TMX, 47.1%),但TMX组(初始治疗阶段:8.3%,后续治疗阶段:12.5%)的流产率明显低于CC组(初始治疗阶段:22.7%,后续治疗阶段:62.5%)(p < 0.05)。根据患者接受的药物进行合并计算时,在TMX治疗期间怀孕的患者流产率明显低于对照组(9.4% vs. CC, 33.3%) (p < 0.05)。结论:他莫昔芬和枸橼酸克罗米芬对黄体期功能障碍患者的妊娠似乎同样有效。然而,他莫昔芬治疗与自然流产的发生率较低有关;因此,他莫昔芬可能是治疗黄体期功能障碍的不孕妇女的较好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信