{"title":"Less miscarriage in pregnancy following Tamoxifen treatment of infertile patients with luteal phase dysfunction as compared to clomiphene treatment.","authors":"C H Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy and the reproductive outcomes of Tamoxifen (TMX) vs. clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment in infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty-seven consecutive infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction were randomly assigned to two treatment groups as: group 1 (TMX followed by CC) and group 2 (CC followed by TMX). The medications administered in the initial and the subsequent cross-over phase were given for 4 to 6 cycles except in those patients who achieved pregnancy within the first three cycles of treatment. The rates of pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and live-birth were calculated for comparison. Demographic profile and the frequency of other infertility factors between the two groups were comparable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pregnancy rates were similar between TMX and CC treatment (initial treatment phase: TMX, 50.0% vs. CC, 56.4%; subsequent treatment phase: CC, 33.3% vs. TMX, 47.1%), but the abortion rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in TMX treatments (initial treatment phase: 8.3% and subsequent treatment phase: 12.5%) than that of CC treatments (initial treatment phase: 22.7% and subsequent treatment phase: 62.5%). When the rates were calculated by pooling the patients according to the medication they received, the miscarriage rate was significantly lower (p < 0.05) if the patients conceived during the TMX treatment (9.4% vs. CC, 33.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tamoxifen and clomiphene citrate seem to be similarly effective in achieving pregnancy in patients with luteal phase dysfunction. However, Tamoxifen therapy is associated with a lower incidence of spontaneous abortion; thus Tamoxifen may be the better choice for the therapy of infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11444,"journal":{"name":"Early pregnancy : biology and medicine : the official journal of the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early pregnancy : biology and medicine : the official journal of the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and the reproductive outcomes of Tamoxifen (TMX) vs. clomiphene citrate (CC) treatment in infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.
Methods: Eighty-seven consecutive infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction were randomly assigned to two treatment groups as: group 1 (TMX followed by CC) and group 2 (CC followed by TMX). The medications administered in the initial and the subsequent cross-over phase were given for 4 to 6 cycles except in those patients who achieved pregnancy within the first three cycles of treatment. The rates of pregnancy, spontaneous abortion and live-birth were calculated for comparison. Demographic profile and the frequency of other infertility factors between the two groups were comparable.
Results: The pregnancy rates were similar between TMX and CC treatment (initial treatment phase: TMX, 50.0% vs. CC, 56.4%; subsequent treatment phase: CC, 33.3% vs. TMX, 47.1%), but the abortion rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in TMX treatments (initial treatment phase: 8.3% and subsequent treatment phase: 12.5%) than that of CC treatments (initial treatment phase: 22.7% and subsequent treatment phase: 62.5%). When the rates were calculated by pooling the patients according to the medication they received, the miscarriage rate was significantly lower (p < 0.05) if the patients conceived during the TMX treatment (9.4% vs. CC, 33.3%).
Conclusions: Tamoxifen and clomiphene citrate seem to be similarly effective in achieving pregnancy in patients with luteal phase dysfunction. However, Tamoxifen therapy is associated with a lower incidence of spontaneous abortion; thus Tamoxifen may be the better choice for the therapy of infertile women with luteal phase dysfunction.