Stability of cutaneous anergy in women with or at risk for HIV infection. HIV Epidemiology Research Study Group.

R S Klein, J Sobel, T Flanigan, D Smith, J B Margolick
{"title":"Stability of cutaneous anergy in women with or at risk for HIV infection. HIV Epidemiology Research Study Group.","authors":"R S Klein,&nbsp;J Sobel,&nbsp;T Flanigan,&nbsp;D Smith,&nbsp;J B Margolick","doi":"10.1097/00042560-199903010-00004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the stability of cutaneous anergy in women with or at risk for HIV infection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective multicenter cohort study</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews, CD4+ lymphocyte counts, and intradermal skin testing with mumps, Candida, and tetanus toxoid antigens were performed on two occasions at a median interval of 74 weeks in 436 HIV-seropositive and 252 seronegative at-risk women; only 10 (2%) HIV-seropositive women were taking highly active antiretroviral therapy at the time of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing. Anergy was defined as induration <2 mm to all three antigens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Skin test reactivity at repeat testing was seen in 202 of 233 (87%) HIV-seronegative women who were not anergic at baseline, compared with 10 (53%) of 19 seronegative women who were anergic at baseline (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.5). Anergy at retesting was seen in 108 of 169 (64%) HIV-seropositive women who were previously anergic, compared with 77 of 267 (29%) who were not previously anergic (RR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-2.8). Among initially anergic seropositive women, CD4+ lymphocyte counts were lower at both initial and follow-up testing in those who remained anergic than in those who reacted at follow-up (p < .001). The relative risks for anergy at retesting of initially anergic seropositive women, compared with initially reactive seropositive women, were related to CD4+ level; 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4-4.3) for CD4+ counts < 200 cells/mm3, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7) for CD4+ counts 200-500 cells/mm3, and 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.8) for CD4+ counts >500 cells/mm3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although anergic HIV-seropositive women may become reactive, cutaneous anergy predicts a higher likelihood of anergy at retesting as well as lower CD4+ counts. Stability of anergy is greatest in HIV-seropositive women with low CD4+ counts.</p>","PeriodicalId":14731,"journal":{"name":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology : official publication of the International Retrovirology Association","volume":"20 3","pages":"238-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00042560-199903010-00004","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes and human retrovirology : official publication of the International Retrovirology Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-199903010-00004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: To study the stability of cutaneous anergy in women with or at risk for HIV infection.

Design: Prospective multicenter cohort study

Methods: Interviews, CD4+ lymphocyte counts, and intradermal skin testing with mumps, Candida, and tetanus toxoid antigens were performed on two occasions at a median interval of 74 weeks in 436 HIV-seropositive and 252 seronegative at-risk women; only 10 (2%) HIV-seropositive women were taking highly active antiretroviral therapy at the time of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) testing. Anergy was defined as induration <2 mm to all three antigens.

Results: Skin test reactivity at repeat testing was seen in 202 of 233 (87%) HIV-seronegative women who were not anergic at baseline, compared with 10 (53%) of 19 seronegative women who were anergic at baseline (relative risk [RR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.5). Anergy at retesting was seen in 108 of 169 (64%) HIV-seropositive women who were previously anergic, compared with 77 of 267 (29%) who were not previously anergic (RR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8-2.8). Among initially anergic seropositive women, CD4+ lymphocyte counts were lower at both initial and follow-up testing in those who remained anergic than in those who reacted at follow-up (p < .001). The relative risks for anergy at retesting of initially anergic seropositive women, compared with initially reactive seropositive women, were related to CD4+ level; 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4-4.3) for CD4+ counts < 200 cells/mm3, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7) for CD4+ counts 200-500 cells/mm3, and 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.8) for CD4+ counts >500 cells/mm3.

Conclusions: Although anergic HIV-seropositive women may become reactive, cutaneous anergy predicts a higher likelihood of anergy at retesting as well as lower CD4+ counts. Stability of anergy is greatest in HIV-seropositive women with low CD4+ counts.

有或有感染HIV风险的妇女皮肤能量的稳定性。艾滋病流行病学研究小组。
目的:研究HIV感染妇女及高危妇女皮肤能量的稳定性。设计:前瞻性多中心队列研究方法:对436名hiv血清阳性和252名血清阴性的高危妇女进行了两次访谈、CD4+淋巴细胞计数和腮腺炎、念珠菌和破伤风类毒素抗原的皮内皮肤试验,中间间隔为74周;在进行迟发性超敏反应(DTH)检测时,仅有10名(2%)hiv血清阳性妇女正在接受高活性抗逆转录病毒治疗。结果:233名hiv血清阴性妇女中有202名(87%)在基线时无过敏反应,而19名血清阴性妇女中有10名(53%)在基线时无过敏反应(相对风险[RR], 1.7;95%可信区间[CI], 1.07-2.5)。169名hiv血清阳性妇女中有108名(64%)以前曾出现过过敏反应,而267名以前没有过敏反应的妇女中有77名(29%)在重新检测时出现了过敏反应(RR, 2.2;95% ci, 1.8-2.8)。在最初无能抗体血清阳性的妇女中,CD4+淋巴细胞计数在最初和随访测试中,无能抗体的妇女低于随访反应的妇女(p < 0.001)。与最初反应性血清阳性妇女相比,最初无能性血清阳性妇女在重新检测时出现能量的相对风险与CD4+水平有关;CD4+计数< 200个细胞/mm3为2.5 (95% CI, 1.4-4.3), CD4+计数200-500个细胞/mm3为2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7), CD4+计数>500个细胞/mm3为1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.8)。结论:尽管无能性hiv血清阳性的妇女可能会出现反应,但皮肤无能预示着在重新检测时出现无能的可能性更高,CD4+计数也更低。在CD4+计数低的hiv血清阳性妇女中,能量稳定性最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信