Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population.

M A Lemp, B Caffery, K Lebow, R Lembach, J Park, G Foulks, B Hall, R Bowers, S McGarvey, G Young
{"title":"Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact lenses in a dry eye population.","authors":"M A Lemp,&nbsp;B Caffery,&nbsp;K Lebow,&nbsp;R Lembach,&nbsp;J Park,&nbsp;G Foulks,&nbsp;B Hall,&nbsp;R Bowers,&nbsp;S McGarvey,&nbsp;G Young","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted a 3-month, randomized, comparative cross-over study to evaluate the clinical performance of lenses manufactured from omafilcon A on subjects with signs and symptoms of dry eye. The subjects' own daily wear soft lenses were used as controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-six subjects with objective evidence of dry eye, as defined in the NEI/Industry Workshop Report 1995, were fit with either the omafilcon A lenses (Proclear) or new control lenses. Subjects wore the lenses for 6 weeks and then crossed over to bilateral wear of the other lenses for an additional 6 weeks. During each part of the study, we examined subjects at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 weeks. Signs and symptoms of dry eye were evaluated, and on-eye dehydration of the lens was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When the subjects were wearing the omafilcon A lenses, there was a statistically significant improvement in a number of subjective parameters including comfort, dryness, frequency of eye irritation, and frequency of burning. We found significantly less on-eye dehydration of the lens and fluorescein corneal staining with the omafilcon A lenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicated that the daily wear of omafilcon A lenses provided better comfort, fewer symptoms, less on-eye dehydration, and less fluorescein corneal staining than other soft daily wear contact lenses in subjects with mild to moderate dry eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"25 1","pages":"40-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We conducted a 3-month, randomized, comparative cross-over study to evaluate the clinical performance of lenses manufactured from omafilcon A on subjects with signs and symptoms of dry eye. The subjects' own daily wear soft lenses were used as controls.

Methods: Seventy-six subjects with objective evidence of dry eye, as defined in the NEI/Industry Workshop Report 1995, were fit with either the omafilcon A lenses (Proclear) or new control lenses. Subjects wore the lenses for 6 weeks and then crossed over to bilateral wear of the other lenses for an additional 6 weeks. During each part of the study, we examined subjects at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 weeks. Signs and symptoms of dry eye were evaluated, and on-eye dehydration of the lens was assessed.

Results: When the subjects were wearing the omafilcon A lenses, there was a statistically significant improvement in a number of subjective parameters including comfort, dryness, frequency of eye irritation, and frequency of burning. We found significantly less on-eye dehydration of the lens and fluorescein corneal staining with the omafilcon A lenses.

Conclusions: This study indicated that the daily wear of omafilcon A lenses provided better comfort, fewer symptoms, less on-eye dehydration, and less fluorescein corneal staining than other soft daily wear contact lenses in subjects with mild to moderate dry eye.

Omafilcon A (Proclear)软性隐形眼镜在干眼症人群中的应用。
目的:我们进行了一项为期3个月的随机对照交叉研究,以评估由omafilcon a制造的隐形眼镜在有干眼症体征和症状的受试者中的临床表现。受试者自己日常佩戴的软性隐形眼镜作为对照。方法:根据NEI/Industry Workshop Report 1995的定义,76例有干眼症客观证据的受试者配戴omafilcon A型隐形眼镜(Proclear)或新型对照隐形眼镜。受试者佩戴该隐形眼镜6周,然后切换到双侧佩戴其他隐形眼镜6周。在研究的每个部分,我们分别在第1周、第1个月和第6周对受试者进行检查。评估干眼症的体征和症状,并评估眼上晶状体脱水。结果:当受试者佩戴omafilcon A隐形眼镜时,在舒适度、干燥度、眼睛刺激频率和灼烧频率等主观参数上有统计学上显著的改善。我们发现omafilcon A晶状体的眼部脱水和角膜荧光素染色明显减少。结论:本研究表明,在轻度至中度干眼症患者中,与其他软性日常配戴隐形眼镜相比,日常配戴omafilcon A隐形眼镜可提供更好的舒适性、更少的症状、更少的眼上脱水和更少的角膜荧光素染色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信