Long-term functional results after manipulation of the frozen shoulder.

J P Reichmister, S L Friedman
{"title":"Long-term functional results after manipulation of the frozen shoulder.","authors":"J P Reichmister,&nbsp;S L Friedman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of shoulder manipulation in the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome remains controversial. Opponents cite the risk of dislocation, fracture, nerve palsy, and rotator cuff tearing as limiting the usefulness of manipulation. A retrospective study of 38 shoulder manipulations in 32 patients was performed. These patients were followed for an average time of 58 months. The patients were examined in follow up for combined shoulder range of motion, external and internal rotation strength, and status of the long head of the biceps. Manipulation was performed in all patients by the senior author and supervised physical therapy was begun within 24 hours of the manipulation. The average recovery time was 13 weeks. In this series, 97% of patients had relief of pain and recovery of near complete range of motion, although 8% required a second manipulation to obtain a successful result. Mild weakness to manual muscle testing was present in 5.3% of patients in external rotation and 10.5% of patients in internal rotation. There was no deterioration of shoulder function with time. In fact, most patients improved with passage of time, even more. There was no evidence of biceps tendon rupture or rotator cuff insufficiency at the time of follow up in any of the patients. No fractures, dislocations or nerve palsies were observed, although one patient who had no premanipulation arthrogram was found to have a rotator cuff tear a few months after failed manipulation. Manipulation of the shoulder can therefore be offered to reduce the pain and period of disability in patients who fail conservative treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":77251,"journal":{"name":"Maryland medical journal (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","volume":"48 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maryland medical journal (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of shoulder manipulation in the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome remains controversial. Opponents cite the risk of dislocation, fracture, nerve palsy, and rotator cuff tearing as limiting the usefulness of manipulation. A retrospective study of 38 shoulder manipulations in 32 patients was performed. These patients were followed for an average time of 58 months. The patients were examined in follow up for combined shoulder range of motion, external and internal rotation strength, and status of the long head of the biceps. Manipulation was performed in all patients by the senior author and supervised physical therapy was begun within 24 hours of the manipulation. The average recovery time was 13 weeks. In this series, 97% of patients had relief of pain and recovery of near complete range of motion, although 8% required a second manipulation to obtain a successful result. Mild weakness to manual muscle testing was present in 5.3% of patients in external rotation and 10.5% of patients in internal rotation. There was no deterioration of shoulder function with time. In fact, most patients improved with passage of time, even more. There was no evidence of biceps tendon rupture or rotator cuff insufficiency at the time of follow up in any of the patients. No fractures, dislocations or nerve palsies were observed, although one patient who had no premanipulation arthrogram was found to have a rotator cuff tear a few months after failed manipulation. Manipulation of the shoulder can therefore be offered to reduce the pain and period of disability in patients who fail conservative treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome.

手法治疗肩周炎后远期功能的影响。
肩关节手法治疗肩周炎仍有争议。反对者认为脱位、骨折、神经麻痹和肩袖撕裂的风险限制了手法的有效性。回顾性研究32例患者的38种肩关节手法。随访时间平均为58个月。随访检查患者肩关节活动度、内外旋强度和肱二头肌长头状态。所有患者均由资深作者操作,并在操作后24小时内开始进行有监督的物理治疗。平均恢复时间为13周。在这个系列中,97%的患者疼痛得到缓解并恢复了接近完全的活动范围,尽管8%的患者需要第二次操作才能获得成功的结果。5.3%的外旋患者和10.5%的内旋患者在手部肌肉测试时出现轻度无力。肩关节功能未随时间恶化。事实上,随着时间的推移,大多数病人的病情都有所改善,甚至更多。在随访时,没有证据表明二头肌肌腱断裂或肩袖功能不全。没有观察到骨折、脱位或神经麻痹,尽管有一名患者在操作失败几个月后未进行术前关节造影,但发现有肩袖撕裂。因此,对于保守治疗肩周炎失败的患者,可以采用肩周炎的手法来减少疼痛和残疾期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信