Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms--clinical findings and effect of ranitidine treatment.

B Hallerbäck, H Glise, B Johansson, A R Rosseland, S Hultén, L Carling, L J Knapstad
{"title":"Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms--clinical findings and effect of ranitidine treatment.","authors":"B Hallerbäck,&nbsp;H Glise,&nbsp;B Johansson,&nbsp;A R Rosseland,&nbsp;S Hultén,&nbsp;L Carling,&nbsp;L J Knapstad","doi":"10.1080/11024159850191175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was performed to study the demography, effect of treatment with ranitidine and relapse pattern in patients with reflux symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with reflux symptoms were examined by endoscopy and included in a double-blind, comparative trial of placebo and ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. for two weeks. At two weeks satisfied patients continued the same treatment. Non-satisfied patients were randomised to ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. or q.i.d for another two weeks. After four weeks medication was stopped and satisfied patients were followed for 24 weeks. No further endoscopy was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-seven patients were randomised. At two weeks there was no significant difference between placebo and ranitidine, regarding the proportion of patients with complete relief from symptoms or satisfied with treatment. Ranitidine was superior to placebo in improving symptoms at two weeks. Ranitidine, 150 mg q.i.d. offered no additional advantage in weeks three to four over prolonging treatment with 150 mg b.i.d. after the first two weeks. Patients with oesophagitis at inclusion relapsed more than those with symptoms only, 67% compared with 52%, (p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effect of ranitidine was marginal compared to placebo. The relapse rate was high after treatment stopped.</p>","PeriodicalId":77418,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","volume":" 583","pages":"6-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11024159850191175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: This study was performed to study the demography, effect of treatment with ranitidine and relapse pattern in patients with reflux symptoms.

Methods: Patients with reflux symptoms were examined by endoscopy and included in a double-blind, comparative trial of placebo and ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. for two weeks. At two weeks satisfied patients continued the same treatment. Non-satisfied patients were randomised to ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. or q.i.d for another two weeks. After four weeks medication was stopped and satisfied patients were followed for 24 weeks. No further endoscopy was performed.

Results: Four hundred and twenty-seven patients were randomised. At two weeks there was no significant difference between placebo and ranitidine, regarding the proportion of patients with complete relief from symptoms or satisfied with treatment. Ranitidine was superior to placebo in improving symptoms at two weeks. Ranitidine, 150 mg q.i.d. offered no additional advantage in weeks three to four over prolonging treatment with 150 mg b.i.d. after the first two weeks. Patients with oesophagitis at inclusion relapsed more than those with symptoms only, 67% compared with 52%, (p = 0.013).

Conclusions: The effect of ranitidine was marginal compared to placebo. The relapse rate was high after treatment stopped.

胃食管反流症状——雷尼替丁治疗的临床表现和效果
背景:本研究旨在研究人口统计学、雷尼替丁治疗的效果以及反流症状患者的复发模式。方法:通过内窥镜检查有反流症状的患者,并将其纳入双盲对照试验,安慰剂和雷尼替丁150mg b.d,为期两周。两周后,满意的患者继续接受同样的治疗。不满意的患者随机服用雷尼替丁150mg b.d或q.d,再持续两周。四周后停止用药,对满意的患者进行了24周的随访。没有进一步的内窥镜检查。结果:427例患者被随机分组。在两周时,在症状完全缓解或对治疗满意的患者比例方面,安慰剂和雷尼替丁之间没有显著差异。两周后,雷尼替丁在改善症状方面优于安慰剂。雷尼替丁,每次150毫克,在第3到第4周没有提供额外的优势,而在前两周后,每次150毫克的延长治疗。合并食管炎的患者比无症状的患者复发更多,67%比52%,(p = 0.013)。结论:与安慰剂相比,雷尼替丁的疗效微乎其微。停药后复发率高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信