Use of surfactant for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in newborn infants in spontaneous breathing. A randomized multicentre clinical pilot-study.

J M Dambeanu, S Parmigiani, B Marinescu, G Bevilacqua
{"title":"Use of surfactant for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in newborn infants in spontaneous breathing. A randomized multicentre clinical pilot-study.","authors":"J M Dambeanu,&nbsp;S Parmigiani,&nbsp;B Marinescu,&nbsp;G Bevilacqua","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of administration of surfactant to premature infants in the delivery-room on respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and short-term (28 days) mortality and outcome in a developing country where mechanical ventilators for infants were not available at the time of the study and neonatal mortality rate is extremely high.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Babies with gestational age 28-33 wks were randomly assigned to receive porcine surfactant prophylaxis (200 mg/kg endotracheally) in the delivery-room or routine assistance in 4 hospitals in Romania. After randomization, supplemental oxygen and continuous airway positive pressure were allowed if available. No rescue treatment was allowed. Diagnosis of RDS was done by means of Silverman score > or = 3 within 24 hrs + requirement of supplemental oxygen > or = 40%. Other examinations were performed depending on local availability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53 babies were analyzed, and 28 were given prophylaxis while 25 resulted controls. The two groups did not differ for gestational age and birth weight (mean values for prophylaxis and control infants respectively: 30.6 +/- 1.6 vs 30.2 +/- 1.7 wks and 1457 +/- 258 vs 1397 +/- 388 g.), nor for sex, type of delivery and Apgar score. Mortality 0-28 days was 42.8 vs 48% in the prophylaxis vs control group (p = ns), due prevalently to intracerebral haemorrhage in both groups. Babies given surfactant tended to die later than controls. The Silverman score resulted significantly reduced in the first 24 hours in the babies given prophylaxis vs the controls (p < 0.05) and values of PaO2/FiO2 ratio were almost constantly higher in the babies that received surfactant compared to the control infants during the first three days of life, even if the differences were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data confirm that prophylaxis of RDS with surfactant in the delivery-room is able to improve the clinical conditions of the babies, however without the complete support of neonatal intensive care it does not resolve the problem of survival and unfavourable outcome in the babies with the lowest gestational ages. This kind of approach might anyhow facilitate the transport of the baby from a peripheral delivery-room to few equipped neonatal intensive care units to be created.</p>","PeriodicalId":6943,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma","volume":"68 Suppl 1 ","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of administration of surfactant to premature infants in the delivery-room on respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and short-term (28 days) mortality and outcome in a developing country where mechanical ventilators for infants were not available at the time of the study and neonatal mortality rate is extremely high.

Design: Babies with gestational age 28-33 wks were randomly assigned to receive porcine surfactant prophylaxis (200 mg/kg endotracheally) in the delivery-room or routine assistance in 4 hospitals in Romania. After randomization, supplemental oxygen and continuous airway positive pressure were allowed if available. No rescue treatment was allowed. Diagnosis of RDS was done by means of Silverman score > or = 3 within 24 hrs + requirement of supplemental oxygen > or = 40%. Other examinations were performed depending on local availability.

Results: 53 babies were analyzed, and 28 were given prophylaxis while 25 resulted controls. The two groups did not differ for gestational age and birth weight (mean values for prophylaxis and control infants respectively: 30.6 +/- 1.6 vs 30.2 +/- 1.7 wks and 1457 +/- 258 vs 1397 +/- 388 g.), nor for sex, type of delivery and Apgar score. Mortality 0-28 days was 42.8 vs 48% in the prophylaxis vs control group (p = ns), due prevalently to intracerebral haemorrhage in both groups. Babies given surfactant tended to die later than controls. The Silverman score resulted significantly reduced in the first 24 hours in the babies given prophylaxis vs the controls (p < 0.05) and values of PaO2/FiO2 ratio were almost constantly higher in the babies that received surfactant compared to the control infants during the first three days of life, even if the differences were not significant.

Conclusion: Our data confirm that prophylaxis of RDS with surfactant in the delivery-room is able to improve the clinical conditions of the babies, however without the complete support of neonatal intensive care it does not resolve the problem of survival and unfavourable outcome in the babies with the lowest gestational ages. This kind of approach might anyhow facilitate the transport of the baby from a peripheral delivery-room to few equipped neonatal intensive care units to be created.

表面活性剂预防新生儿自主呼吸呼吸窘迫综合征的应用。一项随机多中心临床试点研究。
目的:评估在一个发展中国家,在研究时婴儿没有机械呼吸机,新生儿死亡率极高的情况下,在产房给早产儿使用表面活性剂对呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)和短期(28天)死亡率和结局的影响。设计:在罗马尼亚的4家医院,孕龄28-33周的婴儿被随机分配到产房接受猪表面活性剂预防治疗(200 mg/kg气管内注射)或常规辅助治疗。随机化后,如果可能,允许补充氧气和持续气道正压。不允许进行救援治疗。24 h内Silverman评分>或= 3 +补充氧需氧量>或= 40%诊断RDS。其他检查视当地情况而定。结果:分析53例患儿,给予预防28例,对照组25例。两组的胎龄和出生体重没有差异(预防组和对照组的平均值分别为:30.6 +/- 1.6 vs 30.2 +/- 1.7周,1457 +/- 258 vs 1397 +/- 388 g),性别、分娩方式和Apgar评分也没有差异。预防组和对照组0-28天死亡率分别为42.8和48% (p = ns),主要原因是两组的脑出血。给予表面活性剂的婴儿往往比对照组死亡得晚。与对照组相比,给予表面活性剂的婴儿在出生后的前24小时内的Silverman评分显著降低(p < 0.05),而在出生后的前三天,接受表面活性剂的婴儿的PaO2/FiO2比值几乎一直高于对照组,即使差异不显著。结论:我们的数据证实,在产房预防表面活性剂RDS可以改善婴儿的临床状况,但如果没有新生儿重症监护的完全支持,并不能解决最低胎龄婴儿的生存问题和不良结局。无论如何,这种方法可能有助于将婴儿从外围产房运送到设备不多的新生儿重症监护病房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信