The psychological effects of work experiences and disagreements about gender role beliefs in dual-earner couples: a longitudinal study.

Abstract

Using an economically diverse random sample of 300 full-time employed men and women in dual-earner couples from two communities in the Northeast, we estimated the relation between the direction and magnitude of disagreement about gender role ideology (GRI) within couples and psychological distress. We conceptualized GRI within couples as both the couple mean or stable gender-role ideology (the "couple ideology") and as each partner's deviation from the other partner's score. Moreover, for each partner, we estimated the relation between both the stable (i.e., mean) component and the change (i.e., time-varying) component of GRI and distress. Finally, for each partner we estimated the moderating effect of GRI on the relation between job-role quality and distress. Findings are: (a) the more egalitarian the husband's average GRI is relative to his wife's, the less distressed he is; (b) if over time a wife's GRI becomes less egalitarian relative to her husband's, then her distress will be more affected by changes in her job-role quality; (c) for husbands, as the couple's average GRI becomes more egalitarian over time, the effect of job-role quality on distress is lessened; and (d) for a man in a couple with a more egalitarian stable GRI, the effects of change in job-role quality on distress are less pronounced than for a man in a couple with a less egalitarian stable GRI. Results are discussed in terms of new conceptions of GRI revealing the dynamic interaction of within-couples' gender-role ideologies.