The Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis: development and testing.

ANNA journal Pub Date : 1998-10-01
C Thomas-Hawkins, J Fawcett, L Tulman
{"title":"The Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis: development and testing.","authors":"C Thomas-Hawkins,&nbsp;J Fawcett,&nbsp;L Tulman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development and psychometric testing of the Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis (IFS-Dialysis), which was designed to measure functional status in persons who are receiving chronic incenter hemodialysis treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three-phase instrument development design: Phase 1--content validity assessment; Phase 2--examination of internal consistency reliability; Phase 3--examination of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Sample/setting: </strong>175 chronic hemodialysis patients recruited from an urban, free-standing, outpatient dialysis center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Content validity was determined using Popham's average congruency proceudre. Internal consistency reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a subsample of 60 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Content validity was established at 90%. The alpha reliability coefficient for the IFS-Dialysis was 0.86. Subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71-0.82. Correlation between the IFS-Dialysis and the KPS was 0.55. Correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.14-0.53.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IFS-Dialysis has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and initial construct validity. Use of the IFS-Dialysis in clinical practice is appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":76998,"journal":{"name":"ANNA journal","volume":"25 5","pages":"483-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANNA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Development and psychometric testing of the Inventory of Functional Status-Dialysis (IFS-Dialysis), which was designed to measure functional status in persons who are receiving chronic incenter hemodialysis treatment.

Design: Three-phase instrument development design: Phase 1--content validity assessment; Phase 2--examination of internal consistency reliability; Phase 3--examination of construct validity.

Sample/setting: 175 chronic hemodialysis patients recruited from an urban, free-standing, outpatient dialysis center.

Methods: Content validity was determined using Popham's average congruency proceudre. Internal consistency reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Construct validity was examined by bivariate correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) in a subsample of 60 patients.

Results: Content validity was established at 90%. The alpha reliability coefficient for the IFS-Dialysis was 0.86. Subscale alpha coefficients ranged from 0.71-0.82. Correlation between the IFS-Dialysis and the KPS was 0.55. Correlations between the IFS-Dialysis and SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.14-0.53.

Conclusions: The IFS-Dialysis has acceptable content validity, internal consistency, and initial construct validity. Use of the IFS-Dialysis in clinical practice is appropriate.

透析功能状态量表:开发与测试。
目的:开发功能状态透析量表(ifs -透析)并进行心理测量,以测量慢性中心血液透析治疗患者的功能状态。设计:三阶段仪器开发设计:第一阶段——内容效度评估;第二阶段——内部一致性可靠性检验;阶段3——构念效度检验。样本/环境:175名慢性血液透析患者从城市独立门诊透析中心招募。方法:采用Popham平均一致性法测定内容效度。内部一致性信度采用Cronbach's α信度系数确定。在60例患者的子样本中,通过ifs -透析与Karnofsky绩效量表(KPS)和医学结局研究短表-36健康调查(SF-36)之间的双变量相关性来检验结构效度。结果:内容效度为90%。ifs -透析的α信度系数为0.86。子尺度alpha系数范围为0.71-0.82。ifs -透析与KPS的相关性为0.55。ifs -透析与SF-36量表的相关性在0.14-0.53之间。结论:ifs -透析量表具有可接受的内容效度、内部一致性和初始结构效度。在临床实践中使用ifs -透析是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信