Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial.

S Sunna, W P Rock
{"title":"Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"S Sunna,&nbsp;W P Rock","doi":"10.1093/ortho/25.4.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of adhesive precoated brackets (APC) with that of two types of uncoated bracket bases, Straight-Wire and Dyna-Lock, bonded using two types of orthodontic adhesives, Transbond XT, and Right-On. Forty consecutive orthodontic patients entered the trial and 607 brackets were bonded. The incidence and site of first time bond failures were recorded over a period of 1 year. The time required for bonding was also recorded. The overall bond failure rate was 6.6 per cent. There were no significant differences between the failure rates of the five groups, or between the upper and lower arch. However, significantly more brackets failed on the left side than on the right. Premolar brackets were lost most often, whilst incisor brackets failed least. No association was found between bond failure and time elapsed since bonding. Bonding time was least with Right-On adhesive. There were no significant differences between bonding times using APC or Transbond. Results of the present study conflict with those of a previous ex vivo study by the authors, using the same materials and bonding technique. Suggested reasons for this are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75621,"journal":{"name":"British journal of orthodontics","volume":"25 4","pages":"283-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ortho/25.4.283","citationCount":"164","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/25.4.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of adhesive precoated brackets (APC) with that of two types of uncoated bracket bases, Straight-Wire and Dyna-Lock, bonded using two types of orthodontic adhesives, Transbond XT, and Right-On. Forty consecutive orthodontic patients entered the trial and 607 brackets were bonded. The incidence and site of first time bond failures were recorded over a period of 1 year. The time required for bonding was also recorded. The overall bond failure rate was 6.6 per cent. There were no significant differences between the failure rates of the five groups, or between the upper and lower arch. However, significantly more brackets failed on the left side than on the right. Premolar brackets were lost most often, whilst incisor brackets failed least. No association was found between bond failure and time elapsed since bonding. Bonding time was least with Right-On adhesive. There were no significant differences between bonding times using APC or Transbond. Results of the present study conflict with those of a previous ex vivo study by the authors, using the same materials and bonding technique. Suggested reasons for this are discussed.

正畸托槽和粘接剂系统的临床性能:一项随机临床试验。
本研究的目的是评估和比较使用Transbond XT和Right-On两种正畸粘接剂粘合的两种未涂层支架基架(straight wire和Dyna-Lock)与粘合剂预涂层支架(APC)的临床性能。连续40例正畸患者进入试验,共粘接607个托槽。在1年的时间里记录了首次粘结失效的发生率和地点。还记录了粘合所需的时间。整体粘结失败率为6.6%。五组之间的失败率没有显著差异,上下弓之间也没有显著差异。然而,左侧的支架明显比右侧的更多。前磨牙托槽丢失最多,而门牙托槽丢失最少。粘结失效与粘结后的时间没有关联。Right-On粘接时间最短。APC与Transbond的粘接时间无显著差异。本研究结果与作者先前使用相同材料和粘合技术进行的离体研究结果相矛盾。对此提出的原因进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信