Multiple antiphospholipid tests do not increase the diagnostic yield in antiphospholipid syndrome.

M L Bertolaccini, B Roch, O Amengual, T Atsumi, M A Khamashta, G R Hughes
{"title":"Multiple antiphospholipid tests do not increase the diagnostic yield in antiphospholipid syndrome.","authors":"M L Bertolaccini,&nbsp;B Roch,&nbsp;O Amengual,&nbsp;T Atsumi,&nbsp;M A Khamashta,&nbsp;G R Hughes","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The family of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) includes a heterogeneous population of autoantibodies whose specificity is directed against not only phospholipids, but their complex with plasma proteins. Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests are widely performed to screen the aPL family which is associated with thrombotic complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The clinical significance of other aPL tests, including antibodies against phosphatidylserine (aPS), phosphatidylinositol (aPI), phosphatidic acid (aPA), phosphatidylcholine (aPC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether multiple aPL tests have enhanced diagnostic value for APS. We tested IgG/M/A aPS, aPI, aPA, aPC and aPE by ELISA using 10% bovine serum as blocking and sample diluent in 26 SLE patients with clinical manifestations of APS, but negative for both aCL and LA (Group 1). The results were compared with 32 SLE patients without any features of APS (Group 2) and 24 SLE patients with APS (aCL and/or LA positive) (Group 3). In Group 1, 1/26 (4%) was positive for IgA aPE, less frequent than in other groups, and none of the patients had any other aPL. In Group 2, 1/32 (3%) was positive for aPS, two (6%) for aPI, one (3%) for aPA and four (12.5%) for aPE. None was positive for aPC. In the third group, 13/24 (54%) were positive for aPS, 11 (46%) for aPI, 15 (63%) for aPA, four (17%) for aPC and seven (29%) for aPE. Since aPE was found in some patients, we extended the study, including 207 SLE patients, and tested aPE. IgG/M/A aPE was found in six (3%), 10(5%) and 21 (10%), respectively, but no association was found between aPE and any clinical features of APS. This study suggests that screening by multiple aPL tests does not increase the diagnostic yield in APS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9307,"journal":{"name":"British journal of rheumatology","volume":"37 11","pages":"1229-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1229","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

The family of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) includes a heterogeneous population of autoantibodies whose specificity is directed against not only phospholipids, but their complex with plasma proteins. Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests are widely performed to screen the aPL family which is associated with thrombotic complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The clinical significance of other aPL tests, including antibodies against phosphatidylserine (aPS), phosphatidylinositol (aPI), phosphatidic acid (aPA), phosphatidylcholine (aPC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether multiple aPL tests have enhanced diagnostic value for APS. We tested IgG/M/A aPS, aPI, aPA, aPC and aPE by ELISA using 10% bovine serum as blocking and sample diluent in 26 SLE patients with clinical manifestations of APS, but negative for both aCL and LA (Group 1). The results were compared with 32 SLE patients without any features of APS (Group 2) and 24 SLE patients with APS (aCL and/or LA positive) (Group 3). In Group 1, 1/26 (4%) was positive for IgA aPE, less frequent than in other groups, and none of the patients had any other aPL. In Group 2, 1/32 (3%) was positive for aPS, two (6%) for aPI, one (3%) for aPA and four (12.5%) for aPE. None was positive for aPC. In the third group, 13/24 (54%) were positive for aPS, 11 (46%) for aPI, 15 (63%) for aPA, four (17%) for aPC and seven (29%) for aPE. Since aPE was found in some patients, we extended the study, including 207 SLE patients, and tested aPE. IgG/M/A aPE was found in six (3%), 10(5%) and 21 (10%), respectively, but no association was found between aPE and any clinical features of APS. This study suggests that screening by multiple aPL tests does not increase the diagnostic yield in APS.

多次抗磷脂试验不能提高抗磷脂综合征的诊断率。
抗磷脂抗体(aPL)家族包括一个异质性的自身抗体群体,其特异性不仅针对磷脂,而且针对它们与血浆蛋白的复合物。抗心磷脂抗体(aCL)和狼疮抗凝血(LA)试验被广泛用于筛选与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)或抗磷脂综合征(APS)患者血栓性并发症相关的aPL家族。其他aPL检测的临床意义,包括针对磷脂酰丝氨酸(aPS)、磷脂酰肌醇(aPI)、磷脂酸(aPA)、磷脂酰胆碱(aPC)和磷脂酰乙醇胺(aPE)的抗体,尚未确定。本研究的目的是评估多次aPL检测是否增强了APS的诊断价值。我们测试了免疫球蛋白g / M / aPS, aPI, aPA, aPC和猿使用10%牛血清阻断ELISA和样品稀释剂在26个aPS的系统性红斑狼疮患者的临床表现,但消极aCL和拉(组1)。结果与32 aPS的系统性红斑狼疮患者没有任何特征(组2)和24系统性红斑狼疮患者aPS (aCL和/或正面)(组3)。在组1中,1/26(4%)呈阳性IgA猿,比在其他组织少,没有任何其他aPL患者。2组ap阳性1/32 (3%),aPI阳性2例(6%),aPA阳性1例(3%),aPE阳性4例(12.5%)。无一人aPC阳性。第三组ap阳性13/24 (54%),aPI阳性11 (46%),aPA阳性15 (63%),aPC阳性4 (17%),aPE阳性7(29%)。由于在部分患者中发现了aPE,我们扩大了研究范围,纳入了207例SLE患者,并检测了aPE。IgG/M/A aPE分别为6例(3%)、10例(5%)和21例(10%),但未发现aPE与APS的任何临床特征相关。本研究提示,通过多种aPL检测筛查并不能提高APS的诊断率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信