Variation in sensitivity, absorption and density of the central rod distribution with eccentricity.

Acta anatomica Pub Date : 1998-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000046482
R P Tornow, R Stilling
{"title":"Variation in sensitivity, absorption and density of the central rod distribution with eccentricity.","authors":"R P Tornow,&nbsp;R Stilling","doi":"10.1159/000046482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the human rod photopigment distribution and sensitivity with high spatial resolution within the central +/-15 degrees and to compare the results of pigment absorption, sensitivity and rod density distribution (number of rods per square degree).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Rod photopigment density distribution was measured with imaging densitometry using a modified Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Dark-adapted sensitivity profiles were measured with green stimuli (17' arc diameter, 1 degrees spacing) using a T ubingen manual perimeter. Sensitivity profiles were plotted on a linear scale and rod photopigment optical density distribution profiles were converted to absorption profiles of the rod photopigment layer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the absorption profile of the rod photopigment and the linear sensitivity profile for green stimuli show a minimum at the foveal center and increase steeply with eccentricity. The variation with eccentricity corresponds to the rod density distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rod photopigment absorption profiles, retinal sensitivity profiles, and the rod density distribution are linearly related within the central +/-15 degrees. This is in agreement with theoretical considerations. Both methods, imaging retinal densitometry using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and dark-adapted perimetry with small green stimuli, are useful for assessing the central rod distribution and sensitivity. However, at present, both methods have limitations. Suggestions for improving the reliability of both methods are given.</p>","PeriodicalId":6885,"journal":{"name":"Acta anatomica","volume":"162 2-3","pages":"163-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000046482","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anatomica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000046482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the human rod photopigment distribution and sensitivity with high spatial resolution within the central +/-15 degrees and to compare the results of pigment absorption, sensitivity and rod density distribution (number of rods per square degree).

Method: Rod photopigment density distribution was measured with imaging densitometry using a modified Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Dark-adapted sensitivity profiles were measured with green stimuli (17' arc diameter, 1 degrees spacing) using a T ubingen manual perimeter. Sensitivity profiles were plotted on a linear scale and rod photopigment optical density distribution profiles were converted to absorption profiles of the rod photopigment layer.

Results: Both the absorption profile of the rod photopigment and the linear sensitivity profile for green stimuli show a minimum at the foveal center and increase steeply with eccentricity. The variation with eccentricity corresponds to the rod density distribution.

Conclusion: Rod photopigment absorption profiles, retinal sensitivity profiles, and the rod density distribution are linearly related within the central +/-15 degrees. This is in agreement with theoretical considerations. Both methods, imaging retinal densitometry using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope and dark-adapted perimetry with small green stimuli, are useful for assessing the central rod distribution and sensitivity. However, at present, both methods have limitations. Suggestions for improving the reliability of both methods are given.

中心杆分布的灵敏度、吸收率和密度随偏心距的变化。
目的:以高空间分辨率评价人体棒体光色素在中心+/-15度范围内的分布和灵敏度,并比较色素吸收、灵敏度和棒体密度分布(每平方度棒体数)的结果。方法:采用改良Rodenstock扫描激光检眼镜,采用成像密度仪测量视杆光色素密度分布。使用T - ubingen手动周长测量绿色刺激(17'弧直径,1度间距)的暗适应灵敏度曲线。灵敏度曲线按线性标尺绘制,杆状光色素光密度分布曲线转换为杆状光色素层的吸收曲线。结果:视杆光色素的吸收谱和对绿色刺激的线性敏感性谱均显示在中央凹中心最小,并随偏心度急剧增加。偏心距的变化与杆密度分布相对应。结论:视杆光色素吸收谱、视网膜灵敏度谱和视杆密度分布在中心+/-15度范围内呈线性相关。这与理论上的考虑是一致的。这两种方法,使用扫描激光检眼镜成像视网膜密度测量和暗适应视野测量小绿色刺激,是有用的评估中央杆分布和敏感性。然而,目前这两种方法都有局限性。提出了提高两种方法可靠性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信