Can collagen type II sustain a methotrexate-induced therapeutic effect in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis? A double-blind, randomized trial.

British journal of rheumatology Pub Date : 1998-10-01
H J Häuselmann, M Caravatti, B Seifert, K Wang, P Bruckner, G Stucki, B A Michel
{"title":"Can collagen type II sustain a methotrexate-induced therapeutic effect in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis? A double-blind, randomized trial.","authors":"H J Häuselmann,&nbsp;M Caravatti,&nbsp;B Seifert,&nbsp;K Wang,&nbsp;P Bruckner,&nbsp;G Stucki,&nbsp;B A Michel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on the results of two recently published, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled studies, a possible improvement in rheumatoid arthritis disease activity after oral tolerization with triple helical collagen type II has been suggested. The goal of this study was to go one step further and ask the question whether collagen type II can sustain the therapeutic effect induced by methotrexate, the most widely accepted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-two patients with rheumatoid arthritis on stable therapy with methotrexate were enrolled in a 3 month double-blind, randomized and comparative study to examine the efficacy of oral triple helical collagen type II as compared to continuing methotrexate. The dose of methotrexate (or the respective placebo drug) and of concomitant corticosteroids was not changed and intra-articular corticosteroids were not allowed during the 3 months. The primary study endpoint was disease activity as measured by physician and patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While patients under ongoing therapy with methotrexate had, as expected, no change in disease activity, almost all parameters of disease activity and outcome in patients under a daily oral dose of 0.5 mg triple helical collagen type II worsened significantly (highly significant difference in swollen joints, between the two groups, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in side-effects between the two groups during the study period could be demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Substitution of methotrexate with daily 0.5 mg of triple helical collagen type II in patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to a significant increase in disease activity, suggesting that oral collagen type II at the given dose is not capable of sustaining the methotrexate-induced anti-inflammatory effect in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9307,"journal":{"name":"British journal of rheumatology","volume":"37 10","pages":"1110-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Based on the results of two recently published, randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled studies, a possible improvement in rheumatoid arthritis disease activity after oral tolerization with triple helical collagen type II has been suggested. The goal of this study was to go one step further and ask the question whether collagen type II can sustain the therapeutic effect induced by methotrexate, the most widely accepted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: Ninety-two patients with rheumatoid arthritis on stable therapy with methotrexate were enrolled in a 3 month double-blind, randomized and comparative study to examine the efficacy of oral triple helical collagen type II as compared to continuing methotrexate. The dose of methotrexate (or the respective placebo drug) and of concomitant corticosteroids was not changed and intra-articular corticosteroids were not allowed during the 3 months. The primary study endpoint was disease activity as measured by physician and patients.

Results: While patients under ongoing therapy with methotrexate had, as expected, no change in disease activity, almost all parameters of disease activity and outcome in patients under a daily oral dose of 0.5 mg triple helical collagen type II worsened significantly (highly significant difference in swollen joints, between the two groups, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in side-effects between the two groups during the study period could be demonstrated.

Conclusions: Substitution of methotrexate with daily 0.5 mg of triple helical collagen type II in patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to a significant increase in disease activity, suggesting that oral collagen type II at the given dose is not capable of sustaining the methotrexate-induced anti-inflammatory effect in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.

II型胶原能否维持甲氨蝶呤诱导的长期类风湿关节炎患者的治疗效果?一项双盲随机试验。
目的:根据最近发表的两项随机、双盲和安慰剂对照研究的结果,口服三螺旋型胶原蛋白耐受后,类风湿关节炎疾病活动性可能得到改善。本研究的目的是进一步探讨II型胶原蛋白是否可以维持甲氨蝶呤(一种最广泛接受的改善疾病的抗风湿药物)对长期类风湿关节炎患者的治疗效果。方法:92例接受甲氨蝶呤稳定治疗的类风湿关节炎患者参加了一项为期3个月的双盲、随机和比较研究,以检验口服三螺旋胶原II型与持续使用甲氨蝶呤的疗效。在3个月内,甲氨蝶呤(或相应的安慰剂药物)和伴随皮质类固醇的剂量没有改变,关节内不允许使用皮质类固醇。主要研究终点是由医生和患者测量的疾病活动性。结果:在持续接受甲氨蝶呤治疗的患者中,正如预期的那样,疾病活动性没有变化,但在每日口服0.5 mg三螺旋型胶原蛋白的患者中,几乎所有疾病活动性和预后参数均显著恶化(两组之间关节肿胀差异极显著,P < 0.0001)。在研究期间,两组之间的副作用没有显著差异。结论:类风湿性关节炎患者每日0.5 mg三螺旋II型胶原蛋白替代甲氨蝶呤可导致疾病活动性显著增加,提示口服给定剂量的II型胶原蛋白不能维持长期类风湿关节炎患者甲氨蝶呤诱导的抗炎作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信