Improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability of the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, meloxicam, compared with piroxicam: results of the Safety and Efficacy Large-scale Evaluation of COX-inhibiting Therapies (SELECT) trial in osteoarthritis.

J Dequeker, C Hawkey, A Kahan, K Steinbrück, C Alegre, E Baumelou, B Bégaud, H Isomäki, G Littlejohn, J Mau, S Papazoglou
{"title":"Improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability of the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, meloxicam, compared with piroxicam: results of the Safety and Efficacy Large-scale Evaluation of COX-inhibiting Therapies (SELECT) trial in osteoarthritis.","authors":"J Dequeker,&nbsp;C Hawkey,&nbsp;A Kahan,&nbsp;K Steinbrück,&nbsp;C Alegre,&nbsp;E Baumelou,&nbsp;B Bégaud,&nbsp;H Isomäki,&nbsp;G Littlejohn,&nbsp;J Mau,&nbsp;S Papazoglou","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/37.9.946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SELECT is a large-scale, prospective, international, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group trial. Patients with exacerbation of osteoarthritis were treated with the recommended dose of meloxicam (7.5 mg) or piroxicam (20 mg) once daily for 28 days; 4320 patients were administered meloxicam and 4336 piroxicam. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the meloxicam group (22.5%) compared with the piroxicam group (27.9%; P < 0.001), mainly due to the significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in the meloxicam than in the piroxicam group (10.3% vs 15.4%,; P < 0.001), while the efficacy of both drugs was equivalent. Individual GI events occurred significantly less often with meloxicam than piroxicam: dyspepsia (3.4% vs 5.8%; P < 0.001), nausea/vomiting (2.5% vs 3.4%; P < 0.05) and abdominal pain (2.1% vs 3.6%; P < 0.001). There were 16 patients with perforations, ulcerations or bleeding (PUBs) of the upper GI tract in the piroxicam group compared with seven in the meloxicam group (relative risk piroxicam:meloxicam = 1.4). Four PUBs were complicated (perforations or bleedings); none of these occurred in the meloxicam group (relative risk piroxicam:meloxicam = 1.9). The outcome of SELECT is consistent with that of the large-scale clinical trial of similar design and size which compared 7.5 mg meloxicam with 100 mg diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis, and with a previous global analysis of the safety of meloxicam. It adds further data to the proposed relationship between selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and improved GI tolerability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9307,"journal":{"name":"British journal of rheumatology","volume":"37 9","pages":"946-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rheumatology/37.9.946","citationCount":"219","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.9.946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 219

Abstract

SELECT is a large-scale, prospective, international, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group trial. Patients with exacerbation of osteoarthritis were treated with the recommended dose of meloxicam (7.5 mg) or piroxicam (20 mg) once daily for 28 days; 4320 patients were administered meloxicam and 4336 piroxicam. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the meloxicam group (22.5%) compared with the piroxicam group (27.9%; P < 0.001), mainly due to the significantly lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in the meloxicam than in the piroxicam group (10.3% vs 15.4%,; P < 0.001), while the efficacy of both drugs was equivalent. Individual GI events occurred significantly less often with meloxicam than piroxicam: dyspepsia (3.4% vs 5.8%; P < 0.001), nausea/vomiting (2.5% vs 3.4%; P < 0.05) and abdominal pain (2.1% vs 3.6%; P < 0.001). There were 16 patients with perforations, ulcerations or bleeding (PUBs) of the upper GI tract in the piroxicam group compared with seven in the meloxicam group (relative risk piroxicam:meloxicam = 1.4). Four PUBs were complicated (perforations or bleedings); none of these occurred in the meloxicam group (relative risk piroxicam:meloxicam = 1.9). The outcome of SELECT is consistent with that of the large-scale clinical trial of similar design and size which compared 7.5 mg meloxicam with 100 mg diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis, and with a previous global analysis of the safety of meloxicam. It adds further data to the proposed relationship between selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and improved GI tolerability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2抑制剂美洛昔康与吡罗西康相比改善胃肠道耐受性:骨关节炎COX抑制疗法(SELECT)安全性和有效性大规模评估试验的结果。
SELECT是一项大规模、前瞻性、国际性、多中心、双盲、双哑、随机、平行组试验。骨关节炎加重患者采用推荐剂量的美洛昔康(7.5 mg)或吡罗西康(20 mg)治疗,每日1次,连用28天;4320例患者给予美洛昔康,4336例给予吡罗西康。不良事件发生率美洛昔康组(22.5%)明显低于吡罗西康组(27.9%;P < 0.001),主要是由于美洛昔康组的胃肠道(GI)不良事件发生率明显低于吡罗西康组(10.3% vs 15.4%;P < 0.001),而两种药物的疗效相当。美洛昔康组的个体胃肠道事件发生率明显低于吡洛昔康组:消化不良(3.4% vs 5.8%;P < 0.001),恶心/呕吐(2.5% vs 3.4%;P < 0.05)和腹痛(2.1% vs 3.6%;P < 0.001)。吡罗西康组出现上消化道穿孔、溃疡或出血16例,美洛昔康组7例(吡罗西康:美洛昔康的相对危险度= 1.4)。4例为并发症(穿孔或出血);这些在美洛昔康组均未发生(吡罗昔康:美洛昔康的相对风险= 1.9)。SELECT的结果与类似设计和规模的大型临床试验一致,该试验比较了7.5 mg美洛昔康与100 mg双氯芬酸对骨关节炎患者的影响,并与先前对美洛昔康安全性的全球分析一致。它为选择性抑制环氧化酶-2与改善非甾体抗炎药的胃肠道耐受性之间的关系提供了进一步的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信