Dorzolamide, a 40-year wait. From an oral to a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor for the treatment of glaucoma.

Abstract

Dorzolamide, on the basis of its pharmacological profile and lack of undesirable side effects in safety assessment studies together with the fact that it could be formulated in solution at 2%, underwent extensive clinical studies. Early clinical studies in the development of dorzolamide have been described elsewhere (Maren, 1995; Serle and Podos, 1995). In a 1-year study in which a comparison was undertaken in patients for intraocular pressure lowering effects between 2% dorzolamide administered three times daily, 0.5% betaxolol twice daily, and 0.5% timolol twice daily, the peak reductions in intraocular pressure were 23, 21, and 25%, respectively. Tachyphylaxis did not develop to dorzolamide nor were electrolyte and/or systemic side effects encountered (Strahlman et al., 1995). The latter is consistent with results of a pharmacokinetic study in humans in which plasma levels of dorzolamide were lower than the limit of detection (5 ng/ml) at a time when the red blood cell content of dorzolamide had reached steady state which was appreciably less than the red blood cell content of the enzyme (Biollaz et al., 1995). Patients taking 0.5% timolol twice daily received either 2% dorzolamide twice daily or 2% pilocarpine four times daily for 6 months and the additional reductions in intraocular pressure elicited by dorzolamide and pilocarpine were very similar. However, pilocarpine usage resulted in a higher discontinuation rate (Strahlman et al., 1996). In a separate study in which dorzolamide and pilocarpine were compared at these dosage schedules, patients preferred dorzolamide to pilocarpine by a ratio of over 7 to 1 in terms of quality of life (Laibovitz et al., 1995). In summary, the quest for a topical, ocular hypotensive, CA inhibitor, though time-consuming, was a successful one with the introduction of dorzolamide into general clinical practice.