Clinical Usefulness of Flow Cytometry in Detection and Quantification of Fetomaternal Hemorrhage.

Fung, Giulivi, Chisholm, Laberge, Palmer
{"title":"Clinical Usefulness of Flow Cytometry in Detection and Quantification of Fetomaternal Hemorrhage.","authors":"Fung,&nbsp;Giulivi,&nbsp;Chisholm,&nbsp;Laberge,&nbsp;Palmer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>> Objective: To compare the technique of immunofluorescence flow cytometry against traditional Kleihauer testing with respect to the sensitivity and specificity of clinical detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Methods: Blood samples from D-negative unsensitized postpartum women were analyzed by flow cytometry (customized, directly conjugated monoclonal anti-D) and Kleihauer testing using commercial kits as well as a manual technique. Results: Both flow cytometry and manual Kleihauer tests performed well in vitro against known standards, giving similar results with detectable fetal cells in the range of 2-10%. Correlation of in vivo results obtained by flow cytometry and either Kleihauer method was poor. The percentage of fetal red cells detected by flow cytometry was approximately twice that of the manual Kleihauer. Commercial Kleihauer testing proved unreliable in the in vivo setting. Conclusions: Flow cytometry offers a reliable alternative to traditional Kleihauer testing for detecting fetomaternal hemorrhage and may, with standardized methodology, help optimize immunoprophylaxis against erythroblastosis fetalis.</p>","PeriodicalId":79506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of maternal-fetal investigation : the official journal of French Society of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology ... [et al.]","volume":"8 3","pages":"121-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of maternal-fetal investigation : the official journal of French Society of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology ... [et al.]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

> Objective: To compare the technique of immunofluorescence flow cytometry against traditional Kleihauer testing with respect to the sensitivity and specificity of clinical detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Methods: Blood samples from D-negative unsensitized postpartum women were analyzed by flow cytometry (customized, directly conjugated monoclonal anti-D) and Kleihauer testing using commercial kits as well as a manual technique. Results: Both flow cytometry and manual Kleihauer tests performed well in vitro against known standards, giving similar results with detectable fetal cells in the range of 2-10%. Correlation of in vivo results obtained by flow cytometry and either Kleihauer method was poor. The percentage of fetal red cells detected by flow cytometry was approximately twice that of the manual Kleihauer. Commercial Kleihauer testing proved unreliable in the in vivo setting. Conclusions: Flow cytometry offers a reliable alternative to traditional Kleihauer testing for detecting fetomaternal hemorrhage and may, with standardized methodology, help optimize immunoprophylaxis against erythroblastosis fetalis.

流式细胞术在胎儿出血检测和定量中的临床应用。
目的:比较免疫荧光流式细胞术技术与传统Kleihauer试验在临床检测胎母出血的敏感性和特异性。方法:采用流式细胞术(定制的、直接偶联的单克隆抗- d)和Kleihauer试验(商用试剂盒)对产后d阴性未致敏妇女的血液样本进行分析。结果:流式细胞术和手工Kleihauer试验在体外已知标准下表现良好,在2-10%的范围内可检测到胎儿细胞,结果相似。流式细胞术与两种Kleihauer方法的体内结果相关性较差。流式细胞术检测到的胎儿红细胞百分比约为手工Kleihauer的两倍。商业Kleihauer试验在体内被证明是不可靠的。结论:流式细胞术为检测胎母出血提供了一种可靠的替代方法,并可能通过标准化的方法,帮助优化对红细胞增多症胎儿的免疫预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信