Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and the consequences of gallbladder perforation, bile spillage, and “loss” of stones

Yaron Assaff, Ibrahim Matter, Edmond Sabo, Jorge G. Mogilner, Ernest Nash, Jack Abrahamson, Samuel Eldar
{"title":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and the consequences of gallbladder perforation, bile spillage, and “loss” of stones","authors":"Yaron Assaff,&nbsp;Ibrahim Matter,&nbsp;Edmond Sabo,&nbsp;Jorge G. Mogilner,&nbsp;Ernest Nash,&nbsp;Jack Abrahamson,&nbsp;Samuel Eldar","doi":"10.1080/110241598750004238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective:</h3>\n \n <p>To study the factors associated with accidental perforation of the gallbladder and spillage of bile and stones and to assess the consequences of these mishaps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design:</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective study with retrospective bacteriological evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting:</h3>\n \n <p>Teaching hospital, Israel.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Subjects:</h3>\n \n <p>189 Patients who were treated for clinical acute cholecystitis between January 1994 and August 1996.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions:</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures:</h3>\n \n <p>Incidence of accidental perforation of gallbladder and spillage of bile and stones and of conversion and complications in relation to preoperative and operative findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>Bile was spilt in 65 (34%) and gall-stones were “lost” in 27 (14%), 44 (23%) required conversion to an open approach and 36 (19%) developed complications. Preoperative duration of symptoms &gt;96 hours and a palpable gallbladder were associated with accidental perforation of the gallbladder and spillage of bile. A palpable gallbladder, gangrenous cholecystitis, and WBC &gt; 15 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L were associated with stones “lost” in the peritoneum. A history of biliary disease was inversely related to “lost” stones. Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy was associated with male sex, age &gt;60 years, a non-palpable gallbladder, WBC &gt; 15 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, and a gangrenous gallbladder. Complications of surgery were more common among men and associated with fever of &gt;38°C. Neither the conversion nor the complications were associated with perforation of the gallbladder or “lost” stones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion:</h3>\n \n <p>Perforation of the gallbladder and intraperitoneal spillage of bile or stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are not associated with undesirable events, are not indications for conversion, and are not associated with further complications. When patients are given appropriate antibiotics perioperatively and the spilt bile is properly aspirated and the peritoneum irrigated, the operative and postoperative courses are similar to those of patients with unperforated gallbladder. Copyright © 1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100508,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Surgery","volume":"164 6","pages":"425-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/110241598750004238","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/110241598750004238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Objective:

To study the factors associated with accidental perforation of the gallbladder and spillage of bile and stones and to assess the consequences of these mishaps.

Design:

Prospective study with retrospective bacteriological evaluation.

Setting:

Teaching hospital, Israel.

Subjects:

189 Patients who were treated for clinical acute cholecystitis between January 1994 and August 1996.

Interventions:

Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Main outcome measures:

Incidence of accidental perforation of gallbladder and spillage of bile and stones and of conversion and complications in relation to preoperative and operative findings.

Results:

Bile was spilt in 65 (34%) and gall-stones were “lost” in 27 (14%), 44 (23%) required conversion to an open approach and 36 (19%) developed complications. Preoperative duration of symptoms >96 hours and a palpable gallbladder were associated with accidental perforation of the gallbladder and spillage of bile. A palpable gallbladder, gangrenous cholecystitis, and WBC > 15 × 109/L were associated with stones “lost” in the peritoneum. A history of biliary disease was inversely related to “lost” stones. Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy was associated with male sex, age >60 years, a non-palpable gallbladder, WBC > 15 × 109/L, and a gangrenous gallbladder. Complications of surgery were more common among men and associated with fever of >38°C. Neither the conversion nor the complications were associated with perforation of the gallbladder or “lost” stones.

Conclusion:

Perforation of the gallbladder and intraperitoneal spillage of bile or stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are not associated with undesirable events, are not indications for conversion, and are not associated with further complications. When patients are given appropriate antibiotics perioperatively and the spilt bile is properly aspirated and the peritoneum irrigated, the operative and postoperative courses are similar to those of patients with unperforated gallbladder. Copyright © 1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd.

急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术及胆囊穿孔、胆汁外溢和结石“丢失”的后果
目的:探讨胆囊意外穿孔及胆石外溢的相关因素,并评价其后果。设计:前瞻性研究,回顾性细菌学评价。地点:以色列教学医院。对象:1994年1月至1996年8月间接受临床急性胆囊炎治疗的189例患者。干预措施:紧急腹腔镜胆囊切除术。主要观察指标:意外胆囊穿孔、胆汁和结石外溢的发生率、转换发生率以及与术前和手术结果相关的并发症。结果:65例(34%)胆汁溢出,27例(14%)胆结石“丢失”,44例(23%)需要转开腹入路,36例(19%)发生并发症。术前症状持续时间(96小时)和可触及胆囊与胆囊意外穿孔和胆汁溢出有关。可触及的胆囊、坏疽性胆囊炎和白细胞;15 × 109/L伴有腹膜结石“丢失”。胆道疾病史与“结石丢失”呈负相关。腹腔镜胆囊切除术转开腹胆囊切除术与男性、年龄60岁、胆囊不可摸及WBC等因素有关。15 × 109/L,胆囊坏疽。手术并发症在男性中更为常见,并伴有38°C的发热。转换和并发症均与胆囊穿孔或结石“丢失”无关。结论:急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆囊穿孔和腹腔内胆汁或结石的溢出与不良事件无关,不是转换的指征,也与进一步的并发症无关。围手术期给予适当抗生素,适当抽吸溢出胆汁并冲洗腹膜,其手术和术后过程与胆囊未穿孔患者相似。版权所有©1998 Taylor and Francis Ltd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信