The role of oral antimicrobials for the management of intra-abdominal infections.

New horizons (Baltimore, Md.) Pub Date : 1998-05-01
J S Solomkin, E P Dellinger, J M Bohnen, O D Rostein
{"title":"The role of oral antimicrobials for the management of intra-abdominal infections.","authors":"J S Solomkin,&nbsp;E P Dellinger,&nbsp;J M Bohnen,&nbsp;O D Rostein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral therapy for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections has been very limited because those patients are frequently ill and need surgery. In addition, at the time of diagnosis and initial treatment, the infection is often accompanied by ileus, gastrointestinal tract function is frequently unknown, and many patients cannot tolerate oral intake. The use of oral antimicrobials in this setting is a recent advance resulting from the availability of agents with good tissue pharmacokinetics and potent aerobic gram-negative activity. This is the first prospective blinded study of oral therapy to provide data on the characteristics of patients eligible for oral treatment and the consequences of such treatment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In blinded fashion, patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections were randomized to either i.v. ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole or i.v. imipenem throughout their treatment course, or i.v. ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole and treatment with oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole when oral feeding was resumed (CIP/MTZ i.v./oral). Physicians could switch the patient to oral therapy between 3 and 8 days after the start of i.v. treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred fifty-five of 330 (47%) patients were switched to active or placebo oral therapy. Patients who received i.v./oral therapy were treated, overall, for an average of 8.6 +/- 3.6 days, with an average of 4.0 +/- 3.0 days of oral treatment. Of 46 CIP/MTZ i.v./oral patients (active oral arm), treatment failure occurred in 2 patients (4%) compared with 41 patients (23%) who were not switched to oral agents. No patient or disease features, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, severity of illness at study entry, organ source of infection, or duration of treatment were identified as predictors of conversion to oral treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this first prospective examination of sequential i.v./oral therapy for complicated intra-abdominal infections, conversion to oral therapy with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole appears as effective as continued i.v. therapy for patients able to tolerate oral feedings. Patients who can tolerate oral intake may be treated with appropriate oral antimicrobials and are not at any significant increased risk for failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":79357,"journal":{"name":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons (Baltimore, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral therapy for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections has been very limited because those patients are frequently ill and need surgery. In addition, at the time of diagnosis and initial treatment, the infection is often accompanied by ileus, gastrointestinal tract function is frequently unknown, and many patients cannot tolerate oral intake. The use of oral antimicrobials in this setting is a recent advance resulting from the availability of agents with good tissue pharmacokinetics and potent aerobic gram-negative activity. This is the first prospective blinded study of oral therapy to provide data on the characteristics of patients eligible for oral treatment and the consequences of such treatment.

Study design: In blinded fashion, patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections were randomized to either i.v. ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole or i.v. imipenem throughout their treatment course, or i.v. ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole and treatment with oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole when oral feeding was resumed (CIP/MTZ i.v./oral). Physicians could switch the patient to oral therapy between 3 and 8 days after the start of i.v. treatment.

Results: One hundred fifty-five of 330 (47%) patients were switched to active or placebo oral therapy. Patients who received i.v./oral therapy were treated, overall, for an average of 8.6 +/- 3.6 days, with an average of 4.0 +/- 3.0 days of oral treatment. Of 46 CIP/MTZ i.v./oral patients (active oral arm), treatment failure occurred in 2 patients (4%) compared with 41 patients (23%) who were not switched to oral agents. No patient or disease features, such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, severity of illness at study entry, organ source of infection, or duration of treatment were identified as predictors of conversion to oral treatment.

Conclusions: In this first prospective examination of sequential i.v./oral therapy for complicated intra-abdominal infections, conversion to oral therapy with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole appears as effective as continued i.v. therapy for patients able to tolerate oral feedings. Patients who can tolerate oral intake may be treated with appropriate oral antimicrobials and are not at any significant increased risk for failure.

口服抗菌剂在腹腔内感染管理中的作用。
背景:复杂腹腔感染患者的口服治疗非常有限,因为这些患者经常生病并需要手术。此外,在诊断和初始治疗时,感染常伴有肠梗阻,胃肠道功能常不明,许多患者不能耐受口服摄入。在这种情况下使用口服抗菌剂是最近的一项进展,这是由于具有良好组织药代动力学和有效的有氧革兰氏阴性活性的药物的可用性。这是第一个关于口服治疗的前瞻性盲法研究,提供了适合口服治疗的患者的特征和这种治疗的后果的数据。研究设计:采用盲法,将合并腹腔感染的患者随机分为两组,一组在整个治疗过程中静脉注射环丙沙星加甲硝唑或静脉注射亚胺培南,另一组在恢复口服喂养时静脉注射环丙沙星加甲硝唑并口服环丙沙星加甲硝唑(CIP/MTZ静脉注射/口服)。医生可以在开始静脉注射治疗后的3到8天内将患者转为口服治疗。结果:330例患者中有155例(47%)转为主动或安慰剂口服治疗。总体而言,接受静脉注射/口服治疗的患者平均治疗8.6 +/- 3.6天,平均口服治疗4.0 +/- 3.0天。在46例CIP/MTZ静脉注射/口服患者(主动口服臂)中,2例(4%)患者发生治疗失败,而未改用口服药物的41例(23%)患者发生治疗失败。没有患者或疾病特征,如急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分、研究开始时的疾病严重程度、器官感染来源或治疗持续时间被确定为转为口服治疗的预测因子。结论:在首次对复杂腹腔内感染的序贯静脉/口服治疗的前瞻性研究中,对于能够耐受口服喂养的患者,改用环丙沙星加甲硝唑口服治疗与继续静脉治疗一样有效。能够耐受口服摄入的患者可以接受适当的口服抗菌素治疗,并且失败的风险不会显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信