Micro stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction without anticoagulation: clinical experience with two different antithrombotic protocols.

P V Oemrawsingh, M J Schalij, W Udayachalerm, E E van der Wall, A V Bruschke
{"title":"Micro stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction without anticoagulation: clinical experience with two different antithrombotic protocols.","authors":"P V Oemrawsingh,&nbsp;M J Schalij,&nbsp;W Udayachalerm,&nbsp;E E van der Wall,&nbsp;A V Bruschke","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<131::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 4-week outcome following Micro stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction was assessed with the use of two different antithrombotic regimens. The patients were postprocedurally treated with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) and heparin for 24-48 h (Group I; n = 52), or ASA and ticlopidine plus abciximab if indicated (Group II; n = 52). Stent implantation was successful in 49 patients (94%) of group I and in 46 patients (89%) of group II (NS). Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in nine patients (17%) of group I and in 1 patient (2%) of group II (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the rates of mortality, coronary bypass operation, or vascular complications. Micro stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction is highly effective and associated with a low risk for subacute stent thrombosis if the patients are postprocedurally treated with ASA and ticlopidine plus abciximab if indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<131::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-7","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199806)44:2<131::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The 4-week outcome following Micro stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction was assessed with the use of two different antithrombotic regimens. The patients were postprocedurally treated with acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) and heparin for 24-48 h (Group I; n = 52), or ASA and ticlopidine plus abciximab if indicated (Group II; n = 52). Stent implantation was successful in 49 patients (94%) of group I and in 46 patients (89%) of group II (NS). Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in nine patients (17%) of group I and in 1 patient (2%) of group II (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the rates of mortality, coronary bypass operation, or vascular complications. Micro stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction is highly effective and associated with a low risk for subacute stent thrombosis if the patients are postprocedurally treated with ASA and ticlopidine plus abciximab if indicated.

无抗凝治疗的急性心肌梗死患者微支架植入术:两种不同抗凝方案的临床经验。
使用两种不同的抗血栓方案评估急性心肌梗死微支架植入术后4周的结果。术后给予乙酰水杨酸(ASA)和肝素治疗24-48小时(第一组;n = 52),或ASA和噻氯匹定加阿昔单抗(II组;N = 52)。I组49例(94%)患者和II组46例(89%)患者支架植入术成功。I组9例(17%)发生亚急性支架血栓形成,II组1例(2%)发生亚急性支架血栓形成(P < 0.05)。两组在死亡率、冠状动脉搭桥手术或血管并发症方面无显著差异。急性心肌梗死微支架植入术非常有效,如果患者术后接受ASA和噻氯匹定加阿昔单抗治疗,亚急性支架血栓形成的风险很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信