Evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome: a personal clinical audit using the PAR index (peer assessment rating).

O D Otuyemi
{"title":"Evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome: a personal clinical audit using the PAR index (peer assessment rating).","authors":"O D Otuyemi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although various methods have been used to evaluate orthodontic treatment outcome, the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating) was recently developed for the purpose of assessing treatment standards. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the treatment standard of 52 consecutively treated cases during orthodontic postgraduate training (1991-1993). The pre- and post-treatment study models were collected and analysed using the PAR index. The mean age at start of treatment and the mean treatment duration was 13.6 (+/- 3.6) years and 15.9 (+/- 4.5) months respectively. Dual-arch fixed appliance was the predominant form of treatment employed. A high treatment standard was achieved as indicated by the mean PAR score reduction of 82.6 per cent. Most of the cases (92.3%) showed varying degree of improvement. Of the 4 (7.7%) cases classified as \"worse or no difference\", three were treated with removable appliances. With the exception of buccal occlusions, treatment showed strong improvement on individual PAR components. The shortcomings of the method of assessment are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76983,"journal":{"name":"African dental journal : official publication of the Federation of African Dental Associations = Journal dentaire africain","volume":"9 ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African dental journal : official publication of the Federation of African Dental Associations = Journal dentaire africain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although various methods have been used to evaluate orthodontic treatment outcome, the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating) was recently developed for the purpose of assessing treatment standards. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the treatment standard of 52 consecutively treated cases during orthodontic postgraduate training (1991-1993). The pre- and post-treatment study models were collected and analysed using the PAR index. The mean age at start of treatment and the mean treatment duration was 13.6 (+/- 3.6) years and 15.9 (+/- 4.5) months respectively. Dual-arch fixed appliance was the predominant form of treatment employed. A high treatment standard was achieved as indicated by the mean PAR score reduction of 82.6 per cent. Most of the cases (92.3%) showed varying degree of improvement. Of the 4 (7.7%) cases classified as "worse or no difference", three were treated with removable appliances. With the exception of buccal occlusions, treatment showed strong improvement on individual PAR components. The shortcomings of the method of assessment are also discussed.

正畸治疗效果评价:使用PAR指数(同行评估等级)的个人临床审计。
虽然评估正畸治疗结果的方法多种多样,但最近发展了PAR指数(同行评估等级)来评估治疗标准。本研究对1991-1993年口腔正畸研究生培养期间连续治疗的52例患者的治疗水平进行评价。收集处理前和处理后的研究模型并使用PAR指数进行分析。治疗开始时的平均年龄为13.6(±3.6)岁,平均治疗时间为15.9(±4.5)个月。双弓固定矫治器是主要的治疗方式。平均PAR评分降低82.6%,达到了较高的治疗标准。大多数病例(92.3%)表现出不同程度的改善。在4例(7.7%)“较差或无差异”的病例中,有3例使用了可移动矫治器。除颊部咬合外,治疗对单个PAR成分有明显改善。本文还讨论了评价方法的不足之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信