A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cap appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points.

T Arun, N Erverdi
{"title":"A cephalometric comparison of mandibular headgear and chin-cap appliances in orthodontic and orthopaedic view points.","authors":"T Arun,&nbsp;N Erverdi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, the clinical effects of two extra-oral orthopaedic appliances were compared cephalometrically. Lateral cephalograms of 60 individuals were used in this investigation. The study group was randomly divided into three parts as a) control, b) mandibular headgear and c) chin-cap groups. The subjects of the study group were selected among Class III, low angle or vertically normally growing individuals. The total observation period was one year. Results showed that both appliances were effective skeletally, but there were some differences between them. The results are as follows; chin-cap therapy led to an inhibition in the development of the upper face and an effective control of the vertical dimension in addition to the posterior positioning of the mandible. Mandibular headgear inhibited general growth and development of the mandible and showed an increase in lower anterior face height and also, a significant lower molar distalization was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":77213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty","volume":"2 1","pages":"392-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, the clinical effects of two extra-oral orthopaedic appliances were compared cephalometrically. Lateral cephalograms of 60 individuals were used in this investigation. The study group was randomly divided into three parts as a) control, b) mandibular headgear and c) chin-cap groups. The subjects of the study group were selected among Class III, low angle or vertically normally growing individuals. The total observation period was one year. Results showed that both appliances were effective skeletally, but there were some differences between them. The results are as follows; chin-cap therapy led to an inhibition in the development of the upper face and an effective control of the vertical dimension in addition to the posterior positioning of the mandible. Mandibular headgear inhibited general growth and development of the mandible and showed an increase in lower anterior face height and also, a significant lower molar distalization was found.

在正畸和矫形学角度比较下颌头套和下巴帽器具。
在这项研究中,比较了两种口腔外矫形器的临床效果。在这项调查中使用了60个个体的侧位脑电图。研究组随机分为对照组、下颌头套组和下颌帽组。研究组的研究对象选自III类、低角度或垂直生长正常的个体。总观察期1年。结果表明,两种矫治器在骨骼上均有效,但两者之间存在一定差异。研究结果如下:下巴帽治疗抑制了上脸的发育,有效地控制了垂直尺寸以及下颌骨的后定位。下颌头套抑制了下颌骨的生长和发育,显示出下前面部高度的增加,并且发现了显着的下磨牙远端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信