A comparison of bond strengths of soft denture liners to polymethyl methacrylate polymerized by conventional water bath and microwave curing techniques.

S Akesi-Ilbay, S G Ilbay
{"title":"A comparison of bond strengths of soft denture liners to polymethyl methacrylate polymerized by conventional water bath and microwave curing techniques.","authors":"S Akesi-Ilbay,&nbsp;S G Ilbay","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the tensile bond strengths of soft lining materials polymerized by using conventional water bath methods and microwave energy. The soft lining materials used in this investigation were heat temperature vulcanizing (H.T.V.) silicon material Molloplast-B, and room temperature vulcanizing (R.T.V) acrylic material Getz Soft Oryl. The H.T.V. specimens were prepared with retention, additional retention and without retention, and the R.T.V. specimens were prepared by using bonding agent and bonding agent plus retention. All were cured by both conventional water bath and microwave energy. Results showed that the mean bond strength of H.T.V. specimens ranged from 9.6 to 13.12 kg/cm2, while the mean bond strength of R.T.V. specimens ranged from 0.36 to 1.75 kg/cm2. In both conventional and microwave groups, the specimens prepared with retention, additional retention and without retention or using bonding agent and bonding agent plus retention did not show any significant difference when they were compared separately. But the difference between conventional and microwave groups was found significant in both H.T.V. and R.T.V. specimens. It showed that conventional water bath technique is better than microwave technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":77213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty","volume":"1 4","pages":"327-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compared the tensile bond strengths of soft lining materials polymerized by using conventional water bath methods and microwave energy. The soft lining materials used in this investigation were heat temperature vulcanizing (H.T.V.) silicon material Molloplast-B, and room temperature vulcanizing (R.T.V) acrylic material Getz Soft Oryl. The H.T.V. specimens were prepared with retention, additional retention and without retention, and the R.T.V. specimens were prepared by using bonding agent and bonding agent plus retention. All were cured by both conventional water bath and microwave energy. Results showed that the mean bond strength of H.T.V. specimens ranged from 9.6 to 13.12 kg/cm2, while the mean bond strength of R.T.V. specimens ranged from 0.36 to 1.75 kg/cm2. In both conventional and microwave groups, the specimens prepared with retention, additional retention and without retention or using bonding agent and bonding agent plus retention did not show any significant difference when they were compared separately. But the difference between conventional and microwave groups was found significant in both H.T.V. and R.T.V. specimens. It showed that conventional water bath technique is better than microwave technique.

软基义齿衬垫与常规水浴和微波固化聚合的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的粘结强度比较。
本研究比较了传统水浴法和微波法聚合软衬材料的拉伸结合强度。本研究使用的软衬材料为高温硫化硅材料Molloplast-B和室温硫化丙烯酸材料Getz soft Oryl。有保留、附加保留和无保留三种方法制备了H.T.V.样品,有粘结剂和粘结剂加保留两种方法制备了R.T.V.样品。均采用常规水浴和微波能治疗。结果表明,高压高压试件的平均粘结强度为9.6 ~ 13.12 kg/cm2,普通高压高压试件的平均粘结强度为0.36 ~ 1.75 kg/cm2。在常规组和微波组中,分别比较保留、附加保留、不保留或使用粘合剂和粘合剂加保留时,样品没有明显差异。但是常规组和微波组之间的差异在H.T.V.和R.T.V.样本中都是显著的。结果表明,常规水浴法比微波法效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信