A comparative study of the area of the canal space obturated by thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques.

N Gençoğlu, M Günday, M Baş, B Başaran
{"title":"A comparative study of the area of the canal space obturated by thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques.","authors":"N Gençoğlu,&nbsp;M Günday,&nbsp;M Baş,&nbsp;B Başaran","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques were evaluated for the percentage area of canal obturated by gutta-percha and compared with the lateral condensation of gutta-percha technique. All obturation systems were used in conjunction with Grossman's sealer. Single rooted teeth were obturated by either injected thermoplasticized gutta-percha (Ultrafil), thermoplasticized gutta-percha with metal carrier (Thermafil) or lateral condensation of gutta-percha. There were ten specimens in each group. The teeth were embedded in resin, sectioned at 1.5 mm, 3 mm and 4.5 mm from the root apex and examined with a stereomicroscope. Specimens filled by Ultrafil and Thermafil contained a significantly higher percentage of gutta-percha than specimens filled by the lateral condensation technique at every level. However no difference was found between Ultrafil and Thermafil. Three lateral condensation specimens showed voids at the 1.5 mm section; no voids were detected in specimens filled by Ultrafil or Thermafil at any level.</p>","PeriodicalId":77213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty","volume":"2 1","pages":"441-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques were evaluated for the percentage area of canal obturated by gutta-percha and compared with the lateral condensation of gutta-percha technique. All obturation systems were used in conjunction with Grossman's sealer. Single rooted teeth were obturated by either injected thermoplasticized gutta-percha (Ultrafil), thermoplasticized gutta-percha with metal carrier (Thermafil) or lateral condensation of gutta-percha. There were ten specimens in each group. The teeth were embedded in resin, sectioned at 1.5 mm, 3 mm and 4.5 mm from the root apex and examined with a stereomicroscope. Specimens filled by Ultrafil and Thermafil contained a significantly higher percentage of gutta-percha than specimens filled by the lateral condensation technique at every level. However no difference was found between Ultrafil and Thermafil. Three lateral condensation specimens showed voids at the 1.5 mm section; no voids were detected in specimens filled by Ultrafil or Thermafil at any level.

热塑性杜仲胶技术封堵管腔面积的比较研究。
评价两种热塑性杜仲胶技术对管道封闭面积的影响,并与杜仲胶技术的侧缩进行比较。所有的封闭系统都与格罗斯曼封口器一起使用。采用注射热塑性杜仲胶(Ultrafil)、带金属载体的热塑性杜仲胶(Thermafil)或侧向缩合杜仲胶封闭单根牙。每组10只。将牙包埋在树脂中,分别在离根尖1.5 mm、3 mm和4.5 mm处切片,在体视显微镜下观察。Ultrafil和Thermafil填充的样品在各个水平上都比侧向冷凝填充的样品含有更高的杜仲胶百分比。然而,在Ultrafil和Thermafil之间没有发现差异。3个侧缩试件在1.5 mm截面处出现孔洞;在任何水平的Ultrafil或Thermafil填充的样品中均未检测到空洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信