The spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit compared with that seen in other settings. The Madrid Acute Renal Failure Study Group.

Kidney international. Supplement Pub Date : 1998-05-01
F Liaño, E Junco, J Pascual, R Madero, E Verde
{"title":"The spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit compared with that seen in other settings. The Madrid Acute Renal Failure Study Group.","authors":"F Liaño,&nbsp;E Junco,&nbsp;J Pascual,&nbsp;R Madero,&nbsp;E Verde","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute renal failure (ARF) is at a crossroads between nephrology and intensive care medicine. However, there seems to be wide differences between the ARF observed in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared to that observed in other areas of the hospital, particularly when examining the mortality rate. Among the ICU patients the 70% mortality rate is higher to the 50% found in an overall series of studies. Recently, Druml proposed that there is a changing trend in the clinical spectrum of ARF as a convincing reason to justify these differences. According to him, we are moving from an ARF seen as a mono-organ failure to another one observed in a multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) context. Although extremely coherent, this hypothesis has not been fully confirmed in a prospective study. In fact, most authors seem to look at the problem from opposite sides of the river, either from the critical medicine or the nephrological bank. To the best of our knowledge, only one retrospective study has dealt with this topic by comparing outcome of ARF in ICU and non-ICU patients. In this article we aim to overcome this problem by reviewing the data of the prospective epidemiological ARF study carried out in Madrid using two different approaches: (1) comparing the ARF cases observed in the ICU setting with those ARF studied outside the ICU, and (2) comparing the outcome of isolated ARF with the outcome of ARF as part of a MODS in patients treated in both settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17704,"journal":{"name":"Kidney international. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney international. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute renal failure (ARF) is at a crossroads between nephrology and intensive care medicine. However, there seems to be wide differences between the ARF observed in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared to that observed in other areas of the hospital, particularly when examining the mortality rate. Among the ICU patients the 70% mortality rate is higher to the 50% found in an overall series of studies. Recently, Druml proposed that there is a changing trend in the clinical spectrum of ARF as a convincing reason to justify these differences. According to him, we are moving from an ARF seen as a mono-organ failure to another one observed in a multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) context. Although extremely coherent, this hypothesis has not been fully confirmed in a prospective study. In fact, most authors seem to look at the problem from opposite sides of the river, either from the critical medicine or the nephrological bank. To the best of our knowledge, only one retrospective study has dealt with this topic by comparing outcome of ARF in ICU and non-ICU patients. In this article we aim to overcome this problem by reviewing the data of the prospective epidemiological ARF study carried out in Madrid using two different approaches: (1) comparing the ARF cases observed in the ICU setting with those ARF studied outside the ICU, and (2) comparing the outcome of isolated ARF with the outcome of ARF as part of a MODS in patients treated in both settings.

重症监护病房急性肾衰竭的频谱与其他设置的比较。马德里急性肾衰竭研究组。
急性肾功能衰竭(ARF)正处于肾脏病学和重症监护医学之间的十字路口。然而,在重症监护病房(ICU)观察到的ARF与在医院其他区域观察到的ARF之间似乎存在很大差异,特别是在检查死亡率时。在ICU患者中,70%的死亡率高于总体系列研究中发现的50%。最近,Druml提出,ARF的临床谱存在变化趋势,这是证明这些差异的一个令人信服的理由。据他介绍,我们正在从被视为单器官衰竭的ARF转变为在多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)背景下观察到的另一种ARF。尽管这一假设非常连贯,但尚未在前瞻性研究中得到充分证实。事实上,大多数作者似乎都是从河流的两端来看待这个问题,要么是从重症医学角度,要么是从肾库角度。据我们所知,只有一项回顾性研究通过比较ICU和非ICU患者的ARF结果来处理这一主题。在本文中,我们旨在通过回顾在马德里进行的前瞻性流行病学ARF研究的数据来克服这一问题,采用两种不同的方法:(1)比较在ICU环境中观察到的ARF病例与在ICU外研究的ARF病例;(2)比较在这两种环境中治疗的患者的孤立ARF的结果与作为MODS一部分的ARF的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信