Developing Online Support for Clinical Information System Developers: The FAQ Approach

Adam Wilcox, George Hripcsak, Stephen B. Johnson, Jae-Jun Hwang, Min Wu
{"title":"Developing Online Support for Clinical Information System Developers: The FAQ Approach","authors":"Adam Wilcox,&nbsp;George Hripcsak,&nbsp;Stephen B. Johnson,&nbsp;Jae-Jun Hwang,&nbsp;Min Wu","doi":"10.1006/cbmr.1998.1470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective:</strong>We investigate a knowledge-based help system for developers of an integrated clinical information system (CIS). The first objective in the study was to determine the system's ability to answer users' questions effectively. User performance and behavior were studied. The second objective was to evaluate the effect of using questions and answers to augment or replace traditional program documentation.</p><p><strong>Design:</strong>A comparative study of user and system effectiveness using a collection of 47 veritable questions regarding the CIS, solicited from various CIS developers, is conducted. Most questions were concerning the clinical data model and acquiring the data.</p><p><strong>Measurements:</strong>Answers using current documentation known by users were compared to answers found using the help system. Answers existing within traditional documentation were compared to answers existing within question–answer exchanges (Q-A's).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong>The support system augmented 39% of users' answers to test questions. Though the Q-A's were less than 5% of the total documentation collected, these files contained answers to nearly 50% of the questions in the test group. The rest of the documentation contained about 75% of the answers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong>A knowledge-based help system built by collecting questions and answers can be a viable alternative to large documentation files, providing the questions and answers can be collected effectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75733,"journal":{"name":"Computers and biomedical research, an international journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/cbmr.1998.1470","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and biomedical research, an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010480998914707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective:We investigate a knowledge-based help system for developers of an integrated clinical information system (CIS). The first objective in the study was to determine the system's ability to answer users' questions effectively. User performance and behavior were studied. The second objective was to evaluate the effect of using questions and answers to augment or replace traditional program documentation.

Design:A comparative study of user and system effectiveness using a collection of 47 veritable questions regarding the CIS, solicited from various CIS developers, is conducted. Most questions were concerning the clinical data model and acquiring the data.

Measurements:Answers using current documentation known by users were compared to answers found using the help system. Answers existing within traditional documentation were compared to answers existing within question–answer exchanges (Q-A's).

Results:The support system augmented 39% of users' answers to test questions. Though the Q-A's were less than 5% of the total documentation collected, these files contained answers to nearly 50% of the questions in the test group. The rest of the documentation contained about 75% of the answers.

Conclusions:A knowledge-based help system built by collecting questions and answers can be a viable alternative to large documentation files, providing the questions and answers can be collected effectively.

为临床信息系统开发者开发在线支持:常见问题解答方法
目的:研究一种基于知识的临床综合信息系统(CIS)开发人员帮助系统。研究的第一个目标是确定系统有效回答用户问题的能力。研究了用户的表现和行为。第二个目标是评估使用问答来增强或取代传统程序文档的效果。设计:对用户和系统的有效性进行了比较研究,使用了47个关于CIS的真实问题,这些问题来自不同的CIS开发人员。问题多集中在临床数据模型和数据获取方面。测量:使用用户已知的当前文档的答案与使用帮助系统找到的答案进行比较。将传统文档中的答案与问答交换(Q-A)中的答案进行比较。结果:支持系统增加了39%的用户对测试问题的回答。虽然这些问答只占收集到的全部文件的不到5%,但这些文件包含了测试组中近50%问题的答案。其余的文档包含了大约75%的答案。结论:通过收集问题和答案来构建基于知识的帮助系统,可以有效地收集问题和答案,从而替代大型文档文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信