E Scalais , A François-Adant , C Nuttin , A Bachy , J.M Guérit
{"title":"Multimodality evoked potentials as a prognostic tool in term asphyxiated newborns","authors":"E Scalais , A François-Adant , C Nuttin , A Bachy , J.M Guérit","doi":"10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00076-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Hypoxic-ischemic (HI) events may cause permanent brain damage, and it is difficult to predict the long-term neurological outcome of survivors. Multimodality evoked potentials<span> (MEPs), using flash visual (fVEPs), somatosensory (SEPs), and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) may assess the cerebral function in term neonates. MEPs were recorded in 40 hypoxic-ischemic term or near-term neonates during the first week of life in order to predict the neurological outcome. A 3 point grading system registered either mild, moderate, or severe abnormalities. At 24 months of corrected age, the infants were assessed with a blind protocol to determine neurological development. Grade 0 fVEPs and SEPs were associated with a normal neurological status with 100% (</span></span><em>P</em><0.001) of the infants. Abnormal SEPs or total grade (VEPs+SEPs)>I were not associated with normal outcomes (<em>P</em><0.0001). Normal BAEPs did not predict a normal outcome, but severely abnormal BAEPs did predict an abnormal outcome. A significant correlation was found between EP (VEPs+SEPs) grade (<em>r</em>=0.9, <em>P</em><0.0001), Sarnat stage (<em>r</em>=0.6, <em>P</em><0.001), and clinical outcome. This study confirmed that both fVEPs and SEPs are more accurate as prognostic indicators for term neonates. EPs (VEPs+SEPs) also are more accurate in predicting the ultimate neurological outcome compared with the Sarnat scoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100401,"journal":{"name":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","volume":"108 2","pages":"Pages 199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0168-5597(97)00076-2","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168559797000762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44
Abstract
Hypoxic-ischemic (HI) events may cause permanent brain damage, and it is difficult to predict the long-term neurological outcome of survivors. Multimodality evoked potentials (MEPs), using flash visual (fVEPs), somatosensory (SEPs), and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) may assess the cerebral function in term neonates. MEPs were recorded in 40 hypoxic-ischemic term or near-term neonates during the first week of life in order to predict the neurological outcome. A 3 point grading system registered either mild, moderate, or severe abnormalities. At 24 months of corrected age, the infants were assessed with a blind protocol to determine neurological development. Grade 0 fVEPs and SEPs were associated with a normal neurological status with 100% (P<0.001) of the infants. Abnormal SEPs or total grade (VEPs+SEPs)>I were not associated with normal outcomes (P<0.0001). Normal BAEPs did not predict a normal outcome, but severely abnormal BAEPs did predict an abnormal outcome. A significant correlation was found between EP (VEPs+SEPs) grade (r=0.9, P<0.0001), Sarnat stage (r=0.6, P<0.001), and clinical outcome. This study confirmed that both fVEPs and SEPs are more accurate as prognostic indicators for term neonates. EPs (VEPs+SEPs) also are more accurate in predicting the ultimate neurological outcome compared with the Sarnat scoring.