Sodium bicarbonate ingestion does not attenuate the VO2 slow component during constant-load exercise.

K L Heck, J A Potteiger, K L Nau, J M Schroeder
{"title":"Sodium bicarbonate ingestion does not attenuate the VO2 slow component during constant-load exercise.","authors":"K L Heck,&nbsp;J A Potteiger,&nbsp;K L Nau,&nbsp;J M Schroeder","doi":"10.1123/ijsn.8.1.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the effects of sodium bicarbonate ingestion on the VO2 slow component during constant-load exercise. Twelve physically active males performed two 30-min cycling trials at an intensity above the lactate threshold. Subjects ingested either sodium bicarbonate (BIC) or placebo (PLC) in a randomized, counterbalanced order. Arterialized capillary blood samples were analyzed for pH, bicarbonate concentration ([HCO3-]), and lactate concentration ([La]). Expired gas samples were analyzed for oxygen consumption (VO2). The VO2 slow component was defined as the change in VO2 from Minutes 3 and 4 to Minutes 28 and 29. Values for pH and [HCO3-] were significantly higher for BIC compared to PLC. There was no significant difference in [La] between conditions. For both conditions there was a significant time effect for VO2 during exercise; however, no significant difference was observed between BIC and PLC. While extracellular acid-base measures were altered during the BIC trial, sodium bicarbonate ingestion did not attenuate the VO2 slow component during constant-load exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":14321,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sport nutrition","volume":"8 1","pages":"60-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1123/ijsn.8.1.60","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sport nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsn.8.1.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

We examined the effects of sodium bicarbonate ingestion on the VO2 slow component during constant-load exercise. Twelve physically active males performed two 30-min cycling trials at an intensity above the lactate threshold. Subjects ingested either sodium bicarbonate (BIC) or placebo (PLC) in a randomized, counterbalanced order. Arterialized capillary blood samples were analyzed for pH, bicarbonate concentration ([HCO3-]), and lactate concentration ([La]). Expired gas samples were analyzed for oxygen consumption (VO2). The VO2 slow component was defined as the change in VO2 from Minutes 3 and 4 to Minutes 28 and 29. Values for pH and [HCO3-] were significantly higher for BIC compared to PLC. There was no significant difference in [La] between conditions. For both conditions there was a significant time effect for VO2 during exercise; however, no significant difference was observed between BIC and PLC. While extracellular acid-base measures were altered during the BIC trial, sodium bicarbonate ingestion did not attenuate the VO2 slow component during constant-load exercise.

在恒定负荷运动中,碳酸氢钠摄入不会减弱VO2慢速组分。
我们研究了碳酸氢钠摄入对恒定负荷运动中VO2慢速组分的影响。12名身体活跃的男性在高于乳酸阈值的强度下进行了两次30分钟的自行车试验。受试者以随机、平衡的顺序摄入碳酸氢钠(BIC)或安慰剂(PLC)。分析动脉化毛细血管血液样本的pH值、碳酸氢盐浓度([HCO3-])和乳酸浓度([La])。分析过期气体样品的耗氧量(VO2)。VO2慢速分量定义为从第3分钟和第4分钟到第28分钟和第29分钟的VO2变化。与PLC相比,BIC的pH值和[HCO3-]值明显更高。不同条件下[La]无显著差异。在这两种情况下,运动期间的VO2都有显著的时间效应;然而,在BIC和PLC之间没有观察到显著差异。虽然在BIC试验期间改变了细胞外酸碱测量,但在恒定负荷运动期间,碳酸氢钠摄入并未减弱VO2慢速成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信