Comparison of extracapsular and phaco-emulsification cataract extraction techniques when combined with intra-ocular lens placement and trabeculectomy: short-term results.

W L Chia, I Goldberg
{"title":"Comparison of extracapsular and phaco-emulsification cataract extraction techniques when combined with intra-ocular lens placement and trabeculectomy: short-term results.","authors":"W L Chia,&nbsp;I Goldberg","doi":"10.1046/j.1440-1606.1998.00074.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>BACKGROUND METHODS: Fifty patients who had undergone combined extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), intra-ocular lens (IOL) placement and trabeculectomy (ECCE-trab) and 50 who had undergone combined cataract phaco-emulsification, IOL placement and trabeculectomy (phaco-trab) were reviewed over a period of 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperatively, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in both eyes fell significantly (P < 0.005). Initially, IOP fell to roughly equal degrees (mean IOP being 14 mmHg at 3 months; P = 0.84). At 12 months, IOP in the phacotrab group was slightly lower than that in the ECCE-trab group (13.4+/-4.3 vs 15.4+/-4.4 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.0312). The number of pre-operative medications did not appear to affect outcome (P = 0.124). Visual recovery was approximately 3 months faster in the phaco-trab group. By 12 months there was little difference in visual acuity, with an average improvement of two Snellen lines (P = 0.68). The mean change in astigmatism was significantly less in the phaco-trab group (0.61+/-1.25 vs 1.39+/-1.46 D, respectively, P = 0.0063). Transient hypotony (IOP < 5 mmHg) was more frequent in the phaco-trab group (66 vs 32%, respectively; P < 0.002). The frequency of other complications was not significantly different between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both ECCE-trab and phaco-trab procedures are safe and effective. However, the phaco-trab procedure may have slightly improved IOP control, earlier visual recovery and less astigmatism.</p>","PeriodicalId":8596,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1606.1998.00074.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: BACKGROUND METHODS: Fifty patients who had undergone combined extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), intra-ocular lens (IOL) placement and trabeculectomy (ECCE-trab) and 50 who had undergone combined cataract phaco-emulsification, IOL placement and trabeculectomy (phaco-trab) were reviewed over a period of 12 months.

Results: Postoperatively, intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in both eyes fell significantly (P < 0.005). Initially, IOP fell to roughly equal degrees (mean IOP being 14 mmHg at 3 months; P = 0.84). At 12 months, IOP in the phacotrab group was slightly lower than that in the ECCE-trab group (13.4+/-4.3 vs 15.4+/-4.4 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.0312). The number of pre-operative medications did not appear to affect outcome (P = 0.124). Visual recovery was approximately 3 months faster in the phaco-trab group. By 12 months there was little difference in visual acuity, with an average improvement of two Snellen lines (P = 0.68). The mean change in astigmatism was significantly less in the phaco-trab group (0.61+/-1.25 vs 1.39+/-1.46 D, respectively, P = 0.0063). Transient hypotony (IOP < 5 mmHg) was more frequent in the phaco-trab group (66 vs 32%, respectively; P < 0.002). The frequency of other complications was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion: Both ECCE-trab and phaco-trab procedures are safe and effective. However, the phaco-trab procedure may have slightly improved IOP control, earlier visual recovery and less astigmatism.

白内障囊外和超声乳化摘除术联合人工晶状体植入术和小梁切除术的短期效果比较。
方法:对50例联合白内障囊外摘除术(ECCE)、人工晶状体(IOL)植入术和小梁切除术(ECCE-trab)患者和50例联合白内障超声乳化、人工晶状体植入术和小梁切除术(phaco-trab)患者进行了为期12个月的研究。结果:术后双眼眼内压(IOP)明显下降(P < 0.005)。最初,眼压下降到大致相等的程度(3个月时平均眼压为14 mmHg;P = 0.84)。12个月时,phacotrab组IOP略低于ECCE-trab组(分别为13.4+/-4.3 vs 15.4+/-4.4 mmHg;P = 0.0312)。术前用药次数对预后无明显影响(P = 0.124)。phaco-trab组的视力恢复大约快3个月。12个月时,两组视力差异不大,两组斯奈伦线平均改善(P = 0.68)。phaco-trab组散光的平均变化明显小于对照组(分别为0.61+/-1.25和1.39+/-1.46 D, P = 0.0063)。短暂性眼压过低(IOP < 5 mmHg)在phaco-trab组更常见(分别为66%和32%;P < 0.002)。两组间其他并发症发生率无显著差异。结论:ECCE-trab和phaco-trab均安全有效。然而,phaco-trab手术可能略微改善IOP控制,更早的视力恢复和更少的散光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信