Do the homeless get a fair deal from general practitioners?

N Wood, C Wilkinson, A Kumar
{"title":"Do the homeless get a fair deal from general practitioners?","authors":"N Wood,&nbsp;C Wilkinson,&nbsp;A Kumar","doi":"10.1177/146642409711700506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies have indicated the health status of homeless people to be typically poorer than that of the general population, with various studies indicating a high prevalence of psychiatric illness, drug or alcohol misuse and associated socio-medical problems. The Bristol Primary Healthcare Project is an agency which was established to provide a local health care service tailored to the needs of people who are homeless. The present study was carried out as part of an evaluation of the service offered locally to homeless people by General Practitioners (GPs). A postal questionnaire survey of 155 general practices within the Avon FHSA area was carried out. Both fundholding and non-fundholding practices were included, within an area including inner city, urban and rural/semi-rural locations. One hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were returned, providing a response rate of 75%. Twenty-seven percent of practices would fully register a homeless person who seeks to register at the practice, 24% would treat as immediate and necessary and 33% would treat as a temporary resident. Four percent of fundholding practices surveyed would fully register homeless persons and 55% of inner city practices would do so. Seventy-nine percent of doctors indicated that homeless patients were more difficult to treat than other patients. The most frequent problems associated with registering homeless persons were perceived to be the associated social problems (90% of respondents agreed), the lack of medical records (88% agreed), the complex health problems (79% agreed) and the associated alcohol or substance misuse (78% agreed). The study has highlighted a need for government to consider providing incentives to GPs to register homeless people without resulting in adverse effects on their contract targets. The reluctance of some practices to register these patients varied by area and type of practice with doctors at fundholding practices being the most reluctant. There is an identified need for further health education and promotion work and initiatives exemplified by the Bristol Primary Healthcare Project for people who are homeless.</p>","PeriodicalId":73989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Health","volume":"117 5","pages":"292-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/146642409711700506","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/146642409711700506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Many studies have indicated the health status of homeless people to be typically poorer than that of the general population, with various studies indicating a high prevalence of psychiatric illness, drug or alcohol misuse and associated socio-medical problems. The Bristol Primary Healthcare Project is an agency which was established to provide a local health care service tailored to the needs of people who are homeless. The present study was carried out as part of an evaluation of the service offered locally to homeless people by General Practitioners (GPs). A postal questionnaire survey of 155 general practices within the Avon FHSA area was carried out. Both fundholding and non-fundholding practices were included, within an area including inner city, urban and rural/semi-rural locations. One hundred and seventeen completed questionnaires were returned, providing a response rate of 75%. Twenty-seven percent of practices would fully register a homeless person who seeks to register at the practice, 24% would treat as immediate and necessary and 33% would treat as a temporary resident. Four percent of fundholding practices surveyed would fully register homeless persons and 55% of inner city practices would do so. Seventy-nine percent of doctors indicated that homeless patients were more difficult to treat than other patients. The most frequent problems associated with registering homeless persons were perceived to be the associated social problems (90% of respondents agreed), the lack of medical records (88% agreed), the complex health problems (79% agreed) and the associated alcohol or substance misuse (78% agreed). The study has highlighted a need for government to consider providing incentives to GPs to register homeless people without resulting in adverse effects on their contract targets. The reluctance of some practices to register these patients varied by area and type of practice with doctors at fundholding practices being the most reluctant. There is an identified need for further health education and promotion work and initiatives exemplified by the Bristol Primary Healthcare Project for people who are homeless.

无家可归者从全科医生那里得到公平待遇了吗?
许多研究表明,无家可归者的健康状况通常比一般人口差,各种研究表明,精神疾病、药物或酒精滥用以及相关的社会医学问题非常普遍。布里斯托尔初级保健项目是一个机构,设立该机构的目的是根据无家可归者的需要提供地方保健服务。本研究是对全科医生在当地为无家可归者提供的服务进行评估的一部分。对雅芳FHSA区域内155种一般做法进行了邮寄问卷调查。在包括内城、城市和农村/半农村地区在内的一个区域内,包括资金持有和非资金持有做法。共收到117份完整的问卷,回复率为75%。27%的诊所会对寻求登记的无家可归者进行全面登记,24%的诊所会将其视为紧急和必要的,33%的诊所会将其视为临时居民。在接受调查的基金管理机构中,有4%的机构会对无家可归者进行全面登记,而55%的内城机构会这样做。79%的医生表示,无家可归的病人比其他病人更难治疗。与登记无家可归者有关的最常见问题被认为是相关的社会问题(90%的答复者同意)、缺乏医疗记录(88%的答复者同意)、复杂的健康问题(79%的答复者同意)以及相关的酒精或药物滥用(78%的答复者同意)。这项研究强调,政府有必要考虑向全科医生提供激励措施,让他们在不影响合同目标的情况下为无家可归者登记。一些诊所不愿意为这些病人注册的程度因地区和类型而异,其中资金持有诊所的医生最不愿意。已确定需要进一步开展健康教育和促进工作,并采取措施,例如布里斯托尔无家可归者初级保健项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信