Image management in PACS: how should they be decomposed into well-defined and interoperable industrial products?

B Gibaud, B Hervault
{"title":"Image management in PACS: how should they be decomposed into well-defined and interoperable industrial products?","authors":"B Gibaud, B Hervault","doi":"10.3109/14639239709010903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider that no consensus currently exists on how PACS should be decomposed into well-defined and interoperable industrial products. We believe that this lack of consensus hampers the development of multi-vendor PACS and makes the standardization process slower. This paper tries to understand the ins and outs of these choices. To realize this we have used the MIMOSA functional model (EurIPACS project) as a reference model. We have then delineated the borders between several possible industrial products in the fields of work flow management and management of image availability. We have compared these solutions from several perspectives, including the manufacturers' strategy, the users' strategy and the standardization.","PeriodicalId":76132,"journal":{"name":"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique","volume":"22 4","pages":"315-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14639239709010903","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239709010903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider that no consensus currently exists on how PACS should be decomposed into well-defined and interoperable industrial products. We believe that this lack of consensus hampers the development of multi-vendor PACS and makes the standardization process slower. This paper tries to understand the ins and outs of these choices. To realize this we have used the MIMOSA functional model (EurIPACS project) as a reference model. We have then delineated the borders between several possible industrial products in the fields of work flow management and management of image availability. We have compared these solutions from several perspectives, including the manufacturers' strategy, the users' strategy and the standardization.
PACS中的图像管理:如何将它们分解为定义良好且可互操作的工业产品?
我们认为,对于PACS如何分解为定义良好且可互操作的工业产品,目前还没有达成共识。我们认为,这种共识的缺乏阻碍了多供应商PACS的发展,并使标准化进程变慢。本文试图了解这些选择的来龙去脉。为了实现这一点,我们使用了MIMOSA功能模型(EurIPACS项目)作为参考模型。然后,我们在工作流管理和图像可用性管理领域划定了几种可能的工业产品之间的边界。我们从厂商策略、用户策略和标准化三个角度对这些解决方案进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信