[Effectiveness of lead thyroid shield for reducing roentgen ray exposure in trauma surgery interventions of the lower leg].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 1997-12-01 DOI:10.1007/BF02628921
L P Müller, J Suffner, W Mohr, J Degreif, P M Rommens
{"title":"[Effectiveness of lead thyroid shield for reducing roentgen ray exposure in trauma surgery interventions of the lower leg].","authors":"L P Müller,&nbsp;J Suffner,&nbsp;W Mohr,&nbsp;J Degreif,&nbsp;P M Rommens","doi":"10.1007/BF02628921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The occupational radiation exposure of trauma surgeons has increased over the last few years as a result of biologic orthopaedic procedures like intramedullary nailing as closed reduction and insertion of distal interlocking screws need fluoroscopic control. In order to assess the surface doses of the primary surgeon with and without lead shield of the thyroid we performed in vitro measurements during operative procedures of the lower extremities simulating different intraoperative situations under fluoroscopic control. The average registered ionizing dosage without thyroid shield was 70 times higher compared to the measurements with thyroid protection. In a previous study we found average fluoroscopy times during intramedullary nailing of tibia and femur of 4.6 min per procedure. Extrapolation of this value leads to the result, that even when 1000 intramedullary nailings were carried out without wearing lead protection, 13% of the dose limit recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection for the thyroid of 300 mSv per year would not be exceeded, whereas by wearing the lead protection only 0.2% of the recommended dose would be reached.</p>","PeriodicalId":29789,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie","volume":"23 6","pages":"246-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02628921","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The occupational radiation exposure of trauma surgeons has increased over the last few years as a result of biologic orthopaedic procedures like intramedullary nailing as closed reduction and insertion of distal interlocking screws need fluoroscopic control. In order to assess the surface doses of the primary surgeon with and without lead shield of the thyroid we performed in vitro measurements during operative procedures of the lower extremities simulating different intraoperative situations under fluoroscopic control. The average registered ionizing dosage without thyroid shield was 70 times higher compared to the measurements with thyroid protection. In a previous study we found average fluoroscopy times during intramedullary nailing of tibia and femur of 4.6 min per procedure. Extrapolation of this value leads to the result, that even when 1000 intramedullary nailings were carried out without wearing lead protection, 13% of the dose limit recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection for the thyroid of 300 mSv per year would not be exceeded, whereas by wearing the lead protection only 0.2% of the recommended dose would be reached.

[在下肢外伤手术干预中,甲状腺屏蔽铅减少x射线暴露的有效性]。
由于生物骨科手术如髓内钉闭合复位和远端联锁螺钉的插入需要透视控制,创伤外科医生的职业辐射暴露在过去几年中有所增加。为了评估初级外科医生在有铅屏蔽和没有铅屏蔽的情况下对甲状腺的表面剂量,我们在手术过程中对下肢进行了体外测量,在透视控制下模拟不同的术中情况。没有甲状腺屏蔽的平均记录电离剂量比有甲状腺保护的测量值高70倍。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现胫骨和股骨髓内钉的平均透视时间为4.6分钟。根据这一数值推断,即使在不佩戴铅防护装置的情况下进行1000次髓内钉,也不会超过国际放射防护委员会建议的每年300毫西弗的甲状腺剂量限值的13%,而佩戴铅防护装置只会达到建议剂量的0.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信