Shear bond strength of four dentine bonding systems to dry and moist dentine.

P J van der Vyver, F A de Wet
{"title":"Shear bond strength of four dentine bonding systems to dry and moist dentine.","authors":"P J van der Vyver,&nbsp;F A de Wet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies demonstrated that dentine wetness may be an important factor influencing the bond strength of dentine bonding systems. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of four different dentine bonding systems to bond to dry (Group 1) and moist (Group 2) dentine. The four systems tested were Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP, 3M), Imperva Bond (IB, Shofu), All-Bond 2 (AB2, Bisco) and OptiBond (OB, Kerr). In Group 1 the products were applied to dentine surfaces which had been dried with compressed air, after the etchant was rinsed off. In Group 2, however, the dentine was wiped with a damp facial tissue to remove excess water from the surface after rinsing off the etchant. The bond strengths (MPa) for the different products to dry (D) and moist (M) dentine were as follows: SMP: D: 24.9 +/- 4.5; M: 18.9 +/- 4.4; IB: D: 19.2 +/- 3.6; M; 15.6 +/- 2.8; OB: D: 25.9 +/- 2.9; M: 24.5 +/- 4.5 and AB2: D: 16.3 +/- 2.6; M: 27.2 +/- 2.3. Data were statistically analysed using the Wilcoxon Sum of Rank as well as Kruskal-Wallis tests. SMP and IB showed statistically significant higher bond strengths to dry dentine than to moist dentine. OB demonstrated no significant difference in bond strength between dry and moist dentine. AB2, however, demonstrated significantly higher bond strengths to moist than to dry dentine.</p>","PeriodicalId":76669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika","volume":"52 9","pages":"555-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa = Die Tydskrif van die Tandheelkundige Vereniging van Suid-Afrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrated that dentine wetness may be an important factor influencing the bond strength of dentine bonding systems. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of four different dentine bonding systems to bond to dry (Group 1) and moist (Group 2) dentine. The four systems tested were Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP, 3M), Imperva Bond (IB, Shofu), All-Bond 2 (AB2, Bisco) and OptiBond (OB, Kerr). In Group 1 the products were applied to dentine surfaces which had been dried with compressed air, after the etchant was rinsed off. In Group 2, however, the dentine was wiped with a damp facial tissue to remove excess water from the surface after rinsing off the etchant. The bond strengths (MPa) for the different products to dry (D) and moist (M) dentine were as follows: SMP: D: 24.9 +/- 4.5; M: 18.9 +/- 4.4; IB: D: 19.2 +/- 3.6; M; 15.6 +/- 2.8; OB: D: 25.9 +/- 2.9; M: 24.5 +/- 4.5 and AB2: D: 16.3 +/- 2.6; M: 27.2 +/- 2.3. Data were statistically analysed using the Wilcoxon Sum of Rank as well as Kruskal-Wallis tests. SMP and IB showed statistically significant higher bond strengths to dry dentine than to moist dentine. OB demonstrated no significant difference in bond strength between dry and moist dentine. AB2, however, demonstrated significantly higher bond strengths to moist than to dry dentine.

四种牙本质黏结系统对干燥和湿润牙本质的剪切黏结强度。
近年来的研究表明,牙本质湿度可能是影响牙本质结合体系结合强度的重要因素。这项体外研究的目的是评估四种不同的牙本质结合系统与干燥(组1)和湿润(组2)牙本质的结合能力。测试的四种系统分别是Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SMP、3M)、Imperva Bond (IB、Shofu)、All-Bond 2 (AB2、Bisco)和OptiBond (OB、Kerr)。在第1组中,将产品应用于用压缩空气干燥的牙本质表面,然后将蚀刻剂冲洗掉。然而,在组2中,在冲洗掉蚀刻剂后,用潮湿的面巾纸擦拭牙本质,以去除表面多余的水分。不同产品对干质(D)和湿质(M)的粘结强度(MPa)分别为:SMP: D: 24.9 +/- 4.5;M: 18.9±4.4;Ib: d: 19.2 +/- 3.6;M;15.6 +/- 2.8;Ob: d: 25.9±2.9;M: 24.5 +/- 4.5, AB2: D: 16.3 +/- 2.6;M: 27.2±2.3。使用Wilcoxon和of Rank和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行统计分析。SMP和IB与干牙本质的结合强度显著高于与湿牙本质的结合强度。OB显示干牙本质和湿牙本质的结合强度无显著差异。然而,AB2对湿润牙本质的结合强度明显高于干燥牙本质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书