Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.

P Loula, V Jäntti, A Yli-Hankala
{"title":"Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during anaesthesia: assessment of respiration related beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis methods.","authors":"P Loula,&nbsp;V Jäntti,&nbsp;A Yli-Hankala","doi":"10.1007/BF03356569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of neuropathy. Respiration-related heart rate variability (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA) reflects the function of parasympathetic nervous system during spontaneous ventilation while awake. RSA is also claimed to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Power spectrum analysis or various averaging techniques of the heart rate variability are usually applied. The current literature, however, does not usually interpret the ground rules and limitations of the method used, and this may sometimes lead to erroneous conclusions on the data. The aim of our study was to compare and analyse critically the performance of different methods of evaluating RSA during anaesthesia and positive pressure ventilation. Power spectrum analysis, the root mean square of the successive RR-interval difference (RMSSD), and two respiration related methods, RSA index and average phase RSA, were included in the comparison. To test these methods, 11 patients were anaesthetised with isoflurane and their lungs were ventilated mechanically with a frequency of 6 cycles min-1. Each patient received a bolus dose of atropine (20 micrograms kg-1) during the trial. Electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram and tracheal pressure signal from respirator were recorded and analyses were performed off-line. We demonstrated that general indices, such as RMSSD, may be strongly affected by heart rate level and other non-respiration related variations in heart rate. We also showed that the effect of unwanted fluctuations on RSA can be reduced with respiration dependent beat-to-beat methods. Furthermore we confirmed that in addition to the amplitude, also the pattern of respiratory sinus arrhythmia is of interest: the pattern is reversed in phase compared to spontaneous breathing while awake, as we have shown earlier. To analyse RSA during anaesthesia, we recommend the use of an average phase RSA method based on beat-to-beat variability that shows both the amplitude and pattern of RSA. Finally, no measure of RSA should be used without a presentation of the actual beat-to-beat heart rate curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"14 4","pages":"241-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03356569","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Beat-to-beat heart rate variability analysis is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of neuropathy. Respiration-related heart rate variability (respiratory sinus arrhythmia, RSA) reflects the function of parasympathetic nervous system during spontaneous ventilation while awake. RSA is also claimed to monitor the depth of anaesthesia. Power spectrum analysis or various averaging techniques of the heart rate variability are usually applied. The current literature, however, does not usually interpret the ground rules and limitations of the method used, and this may sometimes lead to erroneous conclusions on the data. The aim of our study was to compare and analyse critically the performance of different methods of evaluating RSA during anaesthesia and positive pressure ventilation. Power spectrum analysis, the root mean square of the successive RR-interval difference (RMSSD), and two respiration related methods, RSA index and average phase RSA, were included in the comparison. To test these methods, 11 patients were anaesthetised with isoflurane and their lungs were ventilated mechanically with a frequency of 6 cycles min-1. Each patient received a bolus dose of atropine (20 micrograms kg-1) during the trial. Electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram and tracheal pressure signal from respirator were recorded and analyses were performed off-line. We demonstrated that general indices, such as RMSSD, may be strongly affected by heart rate level and other non-respiration related variations in heart rate. We also showed that the effect of unwanted fluctuations on RSA can be reduced with respiration dependent beat-to-beat methods. Furthermore we confirmed that in addition to the amplitude, also the pattern of respiratory sinus arrhythmia is of interest: the pattern is reversed in phase compared to spontaneous breathing while awake, as we have shown earlier. To analyse RSA during anaesthesia, we recommend the use of an average phase RSA method based on beat-to-beat variability that shows both the amplitude and pattern of RSA. Finally, no measure of RSA should be used without a presentation of the actual beat-to-beat heart rate curve.

麻醉期间呼吸窦性心律失常:呼吸相关心跳变异性分析方法的评估。
心率变异性分析是诊断神经病变的有力工具。呼吸相关心率变异性(呼吸窦性心律失常,RSA)反映了清醒时自主通气时副交感神经系统的功能。据称,RSA还能监测麻醉的深度。通常采用功率谱分析或各种心率变异性的平均技术。然而,目前的文献通常没有解释所使用方法的基本规则和局限性,这有时可能导致对数据的错误结论。我们研究的目的是比较和批判性地分析麻醉和正压通气期间评估RSA的不同方法的性能。采用功率谱分析、逐次rr间隔差(RMSSD)均方根、RSA指数和平均相位RSA两种呼吸相关方法进行比较。为了验证这些方法,11例患者采用异氟醚麻醉,肺机械通气频率为6周期min-1。在试验期间,每位患者都接受了阿托品的大剂量治疗(20微克kg-1)。记录心电图、脑电图及呼吸机气管压力信号并进行离线分析。我们证明一般指标,如RMSSD,可能会受到心率水平和其他非呼吸相关心率变化的强烈影响。我们还表明,不必要的波动对RSA的影响可以通过呼吸依赖的搏动方法来减少。此外,我们证实,除了振幅之外,呼吸性窦性心律失常的模式也很有趣:与清醒时的自发呼吸相比,这种模式在相位上是相反的,正如我们之前所展示的那样。为了分析麻醉期间的RSA,我们建议使用基于节拍对节拍可变性的平均相位RSA方法,该方法显示了RSA的振幅和模式。最后,如果没有实际的心率曲线,就不应该使用RSA测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信