In conflict with conflict.

P E Valentine, S Richardson, M J Wood, M D Godkin
{"title":"In conflict with conflict.","authors":"P E Valentine,&nbsp;S Richardson,&nbsp;M J Wood,&nbsp;M D Godkin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a qualitative, retrospective case study to identify, describe, and develop a theoretical analysis of perceived group process among female nursing educators/administrators, the term \"conflict,\" as traditionally defined in discussions of \"conflict management strategies,\" was rejected. The term did not readily fit with the management styles of the 27 female nurse educators and administrators. Participants rejected \"conflict\" as a term. The word was deliberately avoided. In fact, conflict rejection was a specific administrative process identified as part of the successful working of the group over the three-year period studied. This finding indicates a break with traditional male-oriented literature and therefore may have implications for future research into conflict management strategies, especially into successful management strategies used by women and health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":77058,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","volume":"10 4","pages":"23-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a qualitative, retrospective case study to identify, describe, and develop a theoretical analysis of perceived group process among female nursing educators/administrators, the term "conflict," as traditionally defined in discussions of "conflict management strategies," was rejected. The term did not readily fit with the management styles of the 27 female nurse educators and administrators. Participants rejected "conflict" as a term. The word was deliberately avoided. In fact, conflict rejection was a specific administrative process identified as part of the successful working of the group over the three-year period studied. This finding indicates a break with traditional male-oriented literature and therefore may have implications for future research into conflict management strategies, especially into successful management strategies used by women and health care professionals.

冲突与冲突的冲突。
在一项定性的、回顾性的案例研究中,为了识别、描述和发展对女性护理教育者/管理者群体过程的理论分析,在讨论“冲突管理策略”时传统上定义的术语“冲突”被拒绝了。这个术语并不适合27名女性护士教育者和管理者的管理风格。与会者拒绝使用“冲突”一词。这个词是故意避免使用的。事实上,拒绝冲突是一个具体的行政程序,被确定为该小组在研究的三年期间成功工作的一部分。这一发现表明与传统的以男性为导向的文献有所突破,因此可能对未来对冲突管理战略的研究产生影响,特别是对妇女和保健专业人员使用的成功管理战略的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信