T E Pakkastie, J T Ovaska, E S Pekkala, P E Luukkonen, H J Järvinen
{"title":"A randomised study of colostomies in low colorectal anastomoses.","authors":"T E Pakkastie, J T Ovaska, E S Pekkala, P E Luukkonen, H J Järvinen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the value of covering colostomy for patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two university hospitals, Finland.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>38 patients with air-tight stapled end-to-end anastomoses and complete anastomotic tissue rings were randomly allocated to have a covering colostomy (n = 19) or not.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative mortality, anastomotic leaks, reoperations for leaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical leak rate was 24% (9/38) and six patients (16%) had radiological leaks. The total number of leaks (clinical and radiological together) was similar in the two groups, 7/19 compared with 8/19, respectively. There were fewer clinical leaks in the colostomy group (3/19; 16% compared with 6/19; 32%), but the difference was not significant. Reoperations for leaks were necessary more often in patients who did not have a covering colostomy (6/19; 32% compared with 1/19; 5%, p = 0.09). Two patients who did not have a stoma died from the infective complications of their leaks and one died of heart failure in the colostomy group. One patient who had not been given a stoma initially was left with a permanent colostomy after a leak.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that a covering colostomy does not reduce the leak rate after low anterior resection, but prevents most of the severe infective consequences of the leaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":22411,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the value of covering colostomy for patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal neoplasms.
Design: Prospective randomised study.
Setting: Two university hospitals, Finland.
Subjects: 38 patients with air-tight stapled end-to-end anastomoses and complete anastomotic tissue rings were randomly allocated to have a covering colostomy (n = 19) or not.
Main outcome measures: Postoperative mortality, anastomotic leaks, reoperations for leaks.
Results: The clinical leak rate was 24% (9/38) and six patients (16%) had radiological leaks. The total number of leaks (clinical and radiological together) was similar in the two groups, 7/19 compared with 8/19, respectively. There were fewer clinical leaks in the colostomy group (3/19; 16% compared with 6/19; 32%), but the difference was not significant. Reoperations for leaks were necessary more often in patients who did not have a covering colostomy (6/19; 32% compared with 1/19; 5%, p = 0.09). Two patients who did not have a stoma died from the infective complications of their leaks and one died of heart failure in the colostomy group. One patient who had not been given a stoma initially was left with a permanent colostomy after a leak.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that a covering colostomy does not reduce the leak rate after low anterior resection, but prevents most of the severe infective consequences of the leaks.
目的:探讨覆盖结肠造口术在低位前直肠肿瘤切除术中的应用价值。设计:前瞻性随机研究。环境:芬兰两所大学医院。研究对象:采用气密吻合器端对端吻合及吻合组织环完整的患者38例,随机分为19例和不19例。主要观察指标:术后死亡率、吻合口瘘、吻合口瘘再手术。结果:临床泄漏率为24%(9/38),其中6例(16%)有放射学泄漏。两组的渗漏总数(临床和放射学)相似,分别为7/19和8/19。结肠造口组临床渗漏较少(3/19;16%与6/19相比;32%),但差异不显著。在没有盖性结肠造口的患者中,因瘘再次手术更为必要(6/19;32%比1/19;5%, p = 0.09)。在结肠造口组中,2名没有造口的患者死于瘘口的感染并发症,1名死于心力衰竭。一名患者最初没有接受造口手术,但在瘘后留下了永久性的结肠造口术。结论:我们的研究结果表明,覆盖结肠造口术并不能降低低位前切除术后的瘘漏率,但可以预防瘘漏的大部分严重感染后果。