Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. II. Species-related zone diameter breakpoints to avoid interpretive errors and guard against unrecognized evolution of resistance.

S Ringertz, B Olsson-Liljequist, G Kahlmeter, G Kronvall
{"title":"Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Sweden. II. Species-related zone diameter breakpoints to avoid interpretive errors and guard against unrecognized evolution of resistance.","authors":"S Ringertz,&nbsp;B Olsson-Liljequist,&nbsp;G Kahlmeter,&nbsp;G Kronvall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics appointed a subcommittee on methodology (SRGA-M) in 1987 to investigate ways of defining interpretive breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for susceptibility categories are mainly based on pharmacological properties of the antibiotic, and they are, with few exceptions, valid for all species. However, for several species the MIC breakpoints have failed to distinguish strains with reduced susceptibility from normal susceptible strains. Disk diffusion is the routine method for susceptibility testing in Sweden. Studies of distribution of MICs and zone diameters for clinically important bacterial species have resulted in an emphasis on resistance rather than on susceptibility. The SRGA-M chose to place the zone diameter breakpoints close to the native (often susceptible) population of each species or group of related species. Such species-related zone diameter breakpoints used for susceptibility categories no longer correspond to the pharmacological MIC breakpoints, but divide each species into the fully susceptible (native) population and into those isolates/populations that have acquired a resistance mechanism, resulting in high- or low-grade resistance. By this method the risk of reports of false susceptibility is minimized and early detection of the emergence of antibiotic resistance is ensured.</p>","PeriodicalId":76520,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum","volume":"105 ","pages":"8-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics appointed a subcommittee on methodology (SRGA-M) in 1987 to investigate ways of defining interpretive breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for susceptibility categories are mainly based on pharmacological properties of the antibiotic, and they are, with few exceptions, valid for all species. However, for several species the MIC breakpoints have failed to distinguish strains with reduced susceptibility from normal susceptible strains. Disk diffusion is the routine method for susceptibility testing in Sweden. Studies of distribution of MICs and zone diameters for clinically important bacterial species have resulted in an emphasis on resistance rather than on susceptibility. The SRGA-M chose to place the zone diameter breakpoints close to the native (often susceptible) population of each species or group of related species. Such species-related zone diameter breakpoints used for susceptibility categories no longer correspond to the pharmacological MIC breakpoints, but divide each species into the fully susceptible (native) population and into those isolates/populations that have acquired a resistance mechanism, resulting in high- or low-grade resistance. By this method the risk of reports of false susceptibility is minimized and early detection of the emergence of antibiotic resistance is ensured.

瑞典的抗菌药物敏感性试验。2物种相关的区直径断点,以避免解释错误和防止未被识别的进化抗性。
瑞典抗生素参考小组于1987年任命了一个方法学小组委员会(SRGA-M),研究确定抗菌素敏感性试验解释断点的方法。药敏类别的最小抑制浓度(MIC)断点主要基于抗生素的药理学性质,除了少数例外,它们对所有物种都有效。然而,对于一些物种,MIC断点无法区分敏感性降低的菌株和正常敏感的菌株。圆盘扩散法是瑞典药敏试验的常规方法。对临床重要细菌种类的mic分布和带直径的研究导致强调耐药性而不是敏感性。SRGA-M选择将区域直径断点放置在接近每个物种或亲缘种的本地(通常是易感的)种群的位置。这种用于药敏分类的物种相关带直径断点不再对应药理学MIC断点,而是将每个物种划分为完全敏感(本地)种群和已获得耐药机制的分离株/种群,从而产生高或低级别耐药。通过这种方法,可以最大限度地减少假药敏报告的风险,并确保早期发现抗生素耐药性的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信