6 Current status of imaging procedures in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of osteoarthritis

PhD, DSc Chris Buckland-Wright (Professor of Radiological Anatomy)
{"title":"6 Current status of imaging procedures in the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of osteoarthritis","authors":"PhD, DSc Chris Buckland-Wright (Professor of Radiological Anatomy)","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80007-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy are the methods most widely used to assess the status of osteoarthritic joints. How do these methods compare? As diagnostic tools, what is the relative sensitivity of X-ray versus MRI, arthroscopy versus MRI and arthroscopy versus X-ray? Which imaging modalities can be used for predicting progression? Scintigraphy and MRI can assess the degree of cellular activity in the tissues of a joint, which may help in prognosis. Are the methods proven and are they reliable? Recommendations for clinical trials in knee osteoarthritis, state it is essential that reproducible radiographs are obtained for reliable assessment of progression. Two radiographic views of the knee have been proposed; which provides the more reliable assessment, the knee in extension or semi-flexed? Compared with standard radiography, does microfocal radiography make a difference to patient numbers required for drug trials?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77032,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 727-748"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3579(97)80007-6","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950357997800076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy are the methods most widely used to assess the status of osteoarthritic joints. How do these methods compare? As diagnostic tools, what is the relative sensitivity of X-ray versus MRI, arthroscopy versus MRI and arthroscopy versus X-ray? Which imaging modalities can be used for predicting progression? Scintigraphy and MRI can assess the degree of cellular activity in the tissues of a joint, which may help in prognosis. Are the methods proven and are they reliable? Recommendations for clinical trials in knee osteoarthritis, state it is essential that reproducible radiographs are obtained for reliable assessment of progression. Two radiographic views of the knee have been proposed; which provides the more reliable assessment, the knee in extension or semi-flexed? Compared with standard radiography, does microfocal radiography make a difference to patient numbers required for drug trials?

骨关节炎影像学诊断、预后和监测的现状
x线、磁共振成像(MRI)和关节镜检查是评估骨关节炎关节状态最广泛使用的方法。这些方法比较起来如何?作为诊断工具,x射线相对于MRI,关节镜相对于MRI,关节镜相对于x射线的相对灵敏度是多少?哪些成像模式可用于预测进展?显像和MRI可以评估关节组织中细胞活动的程度,这可能有助于预后。这些方法是否经过验证,是否可靠?膝关节骨性关节炎的临床试验建议指出,获得可重复的x线片是可靠评估进展的必要条件。膝关节的两种x线片已被提出;膝关节处于伸直状态和半屈曲状态,哪一种评估更可靠?与标准放射照相相比,微焦放射照相对药物试验所需的患者数量有影响吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信