Measurement of free triiodothyronine in intensive care patients--comparison of two routine methods.

M Vogeser, K Jacob
{"title":"Measurement of free triiodothyronine in intensive care patients--comparison of two routine methods.","authors":"M Vogeser,&nbsp;K Jacob","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One hundred sera from intensive care patients, and 93 sera from endocrinological outpatients were used for a comparison between two automated assays for free triiodothyronine (Enzymun Test, and Elecsys 2010, both Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). In outpatients a good correlation between both methods was found (r = 0.932). In contrast, comparability between the two assays was poor in intensive care patients (r = 0.75, after exclusion of two outliers); significantly more values in the hypothyroid range were found with the Elecsys 2010 assay (n = 83, compared with n = 33 with the Enzymun Test; chi 2 test p = 0.001). We conclude that routine measurement of free triiodothyronine which has the theoretical advantage of quantifying the biologically active fraction of thyroid hormones may have methodological limitations in severely ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77119,"journal":{"name":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","volume":"35 11","pages":"873-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One hundred sera from intensive care patients, and 93 sera from endocrinological outpatients were used for a comparison between two automated assays for free triiodothyronine (Enzymun Test, and Elecsys 2010, both Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). In outpatients a good correlation between both methods was found (r = 0.932). In contrast, comparability between the two assays was poor in intensive care patients (r = 0.75, after exclusion of two outliers); significantly more values in the hypothyroid range were found with the Elecsys 2010 assay (n = 83, compared with n = 33 with the Enzymun Test; chi 2 test p = 0.001). We conclude that routine measurement of free triiodothyronine which has the theoretical advantage of quantifying the biologically active fraction of thyroid hormones may have methodological limitations in severely ill patients.

重症监护病人游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸的测定——两种常规方法的比较。
来自重症监护患者的100份血清和来自内分泌科门诊患者的93份血清用于两种自动检测游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸的比较(enzyme Test和Elecsys 2010,均为勃林格曼海姆公司,德国曼海姆)。在门诊患者中,两种方法的相关性较好(r = 0.932)。相比之下,在重症监护患者中,两种检测方法的可比性较差(在排除两个异常值后,r = 0.75);Elecsys 2010检测在甲状腺功能减退范围内发现的值明显更多(n = 83,相比之下,酶联检测n = 33;Chi 2检验p = 0.001)。我们得出结论,常规测量游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸在定量甲状腺激素生物活性部分方面具有理论上的优势,但在重症患者中可能存在方法学上的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信