A perspective on the dysplastic nevus controversy.

Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pub Date : 1994-01-01

M W Piepkorn

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1992 an impartial scientific panel concluded that the term "dysplastic nevus" has created significant confusion and thus has outlived its usefulness. This chapter reviews the evolution of the controversy and offers a basis for understanding the panel's recommendations.

本刊更多论文

关于发育不良痣争议的观点。

1992年，一个公正的科学小组得出结论，“发育不良痣”一词造成了严重的混淆，因此已经过时了。本章回顾了争议的演变，并为理解专家组的建议提供了基础。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Pathology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

自引率

0.00%

发文量