[Lymph node dissection during a video-assisted lobectomy is inferior to that in a standard lobectomy].

K Sugi, N Fujita, K Ued, K Nawata, T Tanaka, T Matsuoka, Y Kaneda, K Esato
{"title":"[Lymph node dissection during a video-assisted lobectomy is inferior to that in a standard lobectomy].","authors":"K Sugi,&nbsp;N Fujita,&nbsp;K Ued,&nbsp;K Nawata,&nbsp;T Tanaka,&nbsp;T Matsuoka,&nbsp;Y Kaneda,&nbsp;K Esato","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The indications for a video-assisted lobectomy are currently ill-defined. Clinicians recommend based on the extent of lymph node involvement. Fifty-nine patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer underwent lobectomies with systemic lymph node dissections through a standard thoracotomy (Group C), and 26 patients underwent lobectomies with lymph node dissections using the video-assisted procedure (Group V). The number of dissected lymph nodes at all node levels were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference between groups in the total number of dissected lymph nodes in patients with right lung cancer. The number of dissected hilar and interlobar lymph nodes, however, was less in Group V than that in Group C (hilar: 1.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.6, interlobar: 1.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.4). The total number of dissected lymph nodes in patients with left lung cancer was significantly less in Group V than that in Group C (18.5 +/- 0.3 vs. 28.7 +/- 2.4). In addition, the number of dissected lymph nodes in pratracheal, pretracheal, tracheobronchial, subcarinal, hilar, and interlobar lymph nodes were significantly less in the group V than those in Group C. Although there was no significant difference in the actual survival rates between the groups in this preliminary study, a sufficiently small number of dissected lymph nodes in the video-assisted lobectomy may have resulted in inaccurate staging and poor prognosis in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":6434,"journal":{"name":"[Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Zasshi] [Journal]. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The indications for a video-assisted lobectomy are currently ill-defined. Clinicians recommend based on the extent of lymph node involvement. Fifty-nine patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer underwent lobectomies with systemic lymph node dissections through a standard thoracotomy (Group C), and 26 patients underwent lobectomies with lymph node dissections using the video-assisted procedure (Group V). The number of dissected lymph nodes at all node levels were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference between groups in the total number of dissected lymph nodes in patients with right lung cancer. The number of dissected hilar and interlobar lymph nodes, however, was less in Group V than that in Group C (hilar: 1.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.6, interlobar: 1.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.4). The total number of dissected lymph nodes in patients with left lung cancer was significantly less in Group V than that in Group C (18.5 +/- 0.3 vs. 28.7 +/- 2.4). In addition, the number of dissected lymph nodes in pratracheal, pretracheal, tracheobronchial, subcarinal, hilar, and interlobar lymph nodes were significantly less in the group V than those in Group C. Although there was no significant difference in the actual survival rates between the groups in this preliminary study, a sufficiently small number of dissected lymph nodes in the video-assisted lobectomy may have resulted in inaccurate staging and poor prognosis in these patients.

[视频辅助肺叶切除术中的淋巴结清扫不如标准肺叶切除术]。
视频辅助肺叶切除术的适应症目前尚不明确。临床医生根据淋巴结受累程度推荐。59例临床I期非小细胞肺癌患者通过标准开胸手术进行了肺叶切除术并进行了全身淋巴结清扫(C组),26例患者通过视频辅助手术进行了肺叶切除术并进行了淋巴结清扫(V组)。比较了两组患者在所有淋巴结水平上清扫的淋巴结数量。两组间右肺癌患者淋巴结清扫数无显著性差异。然而,V组肺门和叶间淋巴结清扫数少于C组(肺门:1.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.6,叶间:1.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.4)。V组左肺癌患者清扫淋巴结总数明显少于C组(18.5 +/- 0.3 vs. 28.7 +/- 2.4)。此外,V组的气管旁、气管前、气管支气管、隆突下、肺门和叶间淋巴结的清扫淋巴结数量明显少于c组。虽然在本初步研究中两组的实际生存率没有显著差异,但在视频辅助肺叶切除术中清扫淋巴结数量过少可能导致这些患者的分期不准确和预后不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信