Effects on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow of various dose regimens of latanoprost in human eyes.

C Lindén, A Alm
{"title":"Effects on intraocular pressure and aqueous flow of various dose regimens of latanoprost in human eyes.","authors":"C Lindén,&nbsp;A Alm","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00401.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine if different dose regimens of latanoprost cause a difference in daytime intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal eyes and if such changes could be attributed to an increase in aqueous flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomised, open, cross-over study latanoprost 50 microg/ml was instilled in one eye of 18 volunteers. Three dose regimens (one/three drops once daily or one drop twice daily) were evaluated. IOP was measured at the end of each 14-day treatment period. Aqueous flow and endothelial permeability were assessed by fluorophotometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All dose regimens reduced IOP significantly (p < 0.001). Once daily applications reduced IOP more than twice daily (p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference in aqueous flow was detected between different treatments. One drop daily increased aqueous flow compared with control eyes (p < 0.05). A similar, but not statistically significant tendency was present with the other regimens. Corneal endothelial permeability was not affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Once daily applications of latanoprost reduce IOP more effectively than twice daily in normal subjects. This cannot be explained by an increase in aqueous flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":7152,"journal":{"name":"Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00401.x","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00401.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Purpose: To examine if different dose regimens of latanoprost cause a difference in daytime intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal eyes and if such changes could be attributed to an increase in aqueous flow.

Methods: In a randomised, open, cross-over study latanoprost 50 microg/ml was instilled in one eye of 18 volunteers. Three dose regimens (one/three drops once daily or one drop twice daily) were evaluated. IOP was measured at the end of each 14-day treatment period. Aqueous flow and endothelial permeability were assessed by fluorophotometry.

Results: All dose regimens reduced IOP significantly (p < 0.001). Once daily applications reduced IOP more than twice daily (p < 0.01). No statistically significant difference in aqueous flow was detected between different treatments. One drop daily increased aqueous flow compared with control eyes (p < 0.05). A similar, but not statistically significant tendency was present with the other regimens. Corneal endothelial permeability was not affected.

Conclusion: Once daily applications of latanoprost reduce IOP more effectively than twice daily in normal subjects. This cannot be explained by an increase in aqueous flow.

拉坦前列素不同剂量方案对人眼眼压和水流量的影响。
目的:研究不同剂量的拉坦前列素是否会引起正常眼的日间眼压(IOP)的差异,以及这种变化是否可归因于水流量的增加。方法:在一项随机、开放、交叉研究中,在18名志愿者的一只眼睛中灌注50微克/毫升拉坦前列素。评估了三种给药方案(1 / 3滴每日一次或1滴每日两次)。在每14天治疗期结束时测量IOP。用荧光光度法测定水流量和内皮细胞渗透性。结果:所有给药方案均显著降低IOP (p < 0.001)。每日一次应用可降低IOP超过每日两次(p < 0.01)。不同处理间的水流量无统计学差异。与对照组相比,水流量每天增加1滴(p < 0.05)。其他方案也有类似的趋势,但没有统计学上的显著性。角膜内皮通透性不受影响。结论:正常受试者每日1次应用拉坦前列素比每日2次更有效地降低IOP。这不能用水流动的增加来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信