Reactions to impaired fertility: the vicissitudes of primary and secondary control appraisals.

Abstract

Recent formulations about how perceived control influences adaptation to chronic medical conditions suggest that although a sense of personal (primary) control may decline over time, there are ample opportunities for individuals to make other adaptation-enhancing "secondary control" appraisals such as construing benefits or finding meaning in their threatening circumstance. We describe a longitudinal study of men and women with impaired fertility that evaluates a dynamic relation between primary and secondary control--one in which anticipated benefits increase over time as failed efforts to achieve a desired pregnancy lead to declines in primary control. Forty-six men and women with impaired fertility rated their sense of personal control over fertility outcomes, the extent to which they anticipated benefits in this situation and their outcome expectancy on two occasions separated by 14 months. As predicted, perceived control diminished over time. Changes in anticipated benefits were unrelated to changes in personal control. Anticipating benefits, however, was inversely related to changes in outcome expectancy, such that a more pessimistic expectancy over time was associated with an increase in anticipated benefits. This relation was independent of perceived control and was not mood dependent. We discuss these findings in terms of current theories of control, the need for further longitudinal investigations to evaluate the temporal relations between primary and secondary control appraisals, and implications for infertility research.