Antibody responses against Em18 and Em16 serodiagnostic markers in alveolar and cystic echinococcosis patients from northwest China.

A Ito, H Wen, P S Craig, L Ma, M Nakao, T Horii, X L Pang, M Okamoto, M Itoh, Y Osawa, X G Wang, Y H Liu
{"title":"Antibody responses against Em18 and Em16 serodiagnostic markers in alveolar and cystic echinococcosis patients from northwest China.","authors":"A Ito,&nbsp;H Wen,&nbsp;P S Craig,&nbsp;L Ma,&nbsp;M Nakao,&nbsp;T Horii,&nbsp;X L Pang,&nbsp;M Okamoto,&nbsp;M Itoh,&nbsp;Y Osawa,&nbsp;X G Wang,&nbsp;Y H Liu","doi":"10.7883/yoken1952.50.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Western blot analysis was carried out in order to evaluate new serodiagnostic markers, Em18 and Em16, for differentiation of alveolar echinococcosis (AE) from cystic echinococcosis (CE) using 36 serum samples from hydatid patients from Xinjiang, China, where AE and CE are both endemic and one double infection case has been reported. All AE cases except one (5/6) who exhibited a calcified lesion and a single case of double infection showed antibody responses against Em18 and Em16. Some of CE patient sera (6/22) showed antibody response against Em16 except one who showed that against Em18. Analyses of IgG subclass responses against Em18 and Em16 were carried out using all serum samples showing antibody responses against Em18 and/or Em16 (seven CE, five AE, and one AE + CE) and additional samples of three CE and 22 AE from Sichuan, China. IgG4 was the most predominant antibody subclass. Em18 and Em16 were recognized by both IgG4 and IgG1 (in most cases) or by either IgG4 or IgG1 (in minor cases) or by IgG3 (in very rare cases). Neither Em18 nor Em16 was recognized by IgG2 antibodies. The usefulness of Em18 and Em16 as potential new markers for serological differentiation of human AE and CE, respectively, is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14531,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of medical science & biology","volume":"50 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of medical science & biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken1952.50.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Western blot analysis was carried out in order to evaluate new serodiagnostic markers, Em18 and Em16, for differentiation of alveolar echinococcosis (AE) from cystic echinococcosis (CE) using 36 serum samples from hydatid patients from Xinjiang, China, where AE and CE are both endemic and one double infection case has been reported. All AE cases except one (5/6) who exhibited a calcified lesion and a single case of double infection showed antibody responses against Em18 and Em16. Some of CE patient sera (6/22) showed antibody response against Em16 except one who showed that against Em18. Analyses of IgG subclass responses against Em18 and Em16 were carried out using all serum samples showing antibody responses against Em18 and/or Em16 (seven CE, five AE, and one AE + CE) and additional samples of three CE and 22 AE from Sichuan, China. IgG4 was the most predominant antibody subclass. Em18 and Em16 were recognized by both IgG4 and IgG1 (in most cases) or by either IgG4 or IgG1 (in minor cases) or by IgG3 (in very rare cases). Neither Em18 nor Em16 was recognized by IgG2 antibodies. The usefulness of Em18 and Em16 as potential new markers for serological differentiation of human AE and CE, respectively, is discussed.

西北地区肺泡型和囊性包虫病患者血清诊断标志物Em18和Em16抗体应答
采用Western blot分析方法,对36例中国新疆省肺泡包虫病(AE)和囊性包虫病(CE)患者血清样本进行了Em18和Em16的分析,以评价其鉴别肺泡包虫病(AE)和囊性包虫病(CE)的新血清诊断指标。除1例(5/6)出现钙化病变和1例双重感染外,所有AE病例均出现了针对Em18和Em16的抗体应答。除1例对Em18有抗体应答外,其余患者血清(6/22)对Em16有抗体应答。对所有对Em18和/或Em16有抗体反应的血清样本(7份CE、5份AE和1份AE + CE)以及来自中国四川的3份CE和22份AE样本进行了针对Em18和Em16的IgG亚类反应分析。IgG4是最主要的抗体亚类。Em18和Em16可以被IgG4和IgG1识别(在大多数情况下),或者被IgG4或IgG1识别(在少数情况下),或者被IgG3识别(在极少数情况下)。IgG2抗体均不能识别Em18和Em16。讨论了Em18和Em16分别作为人类AE和CE的潜在新标记物的用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信